Literature DB >> 20538669

Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode.

Hatem Alkadhi1, Paul Stolzmann, Lotus Desbiolles, Stephan Baumueller, Robert Goetti, Andre Plass, Hans Scheffel, Gudrun Feuchtner, Volkmar Falk, Borut Marincek, Sebastian Leschka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and radiation doses of two low-dose protocols for coronary artery imaging with second-generation, dual-source CT in comparison with catheter angiography (CA). DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Prospective, single-centre study conducted in a referral centre enrolling 100 patients with low-to-intermediate risk and suspicion of coronary artery disease. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography and CA. Patients were randomly assigned to two different low-dose CT protocols (each 100 kV/320 mA): in group A (n=50), CT was performed using the prospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-gated step-and-shoot (SAS) mode; in group B (n=50), CT was performed using the prospectively ECG-gated high-pitch mode (pitch 3.4). The image quality and presence or absence of significant coronary stenosis in all coronary segments were evaluated by two blinded and independent observers. CA served as the standard of reference.
RESULTS: Sixty-one significant stenoses were found in group A, and 69 in group B. There was no significant difference in age (group A, 62+/-8 yrs; group B, 63+/-8 yrs; p=0.72), body mass index (group A, 26.4+/-3.1 kg/m2; group B, 25.9+/-2.8 kg/m2; p=0.41) and heart rate (HR) (group A, 58+/-8 bpm; group B, 56+/-10 bpm; p=0.66) between the groups. Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 98.6% (651/660) of segments in group A and in 98.9% (642/649) in group B, with no significant differences between groups. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 94%, 91%, 85% and 97% per-patient in group A, and 93%, 94%, 89% and 97% per-patient in group B (no significant differences). The effective radiation dose in group B (0.9+/-0.1 mSv) was significantly (p<0.01) lower than that in group A (1.4+/-0.4 mSv).
CONCLUSIONS: Both the high-pitch and the SAS mode for low-dose CT coronary angiography provide high accuracy for the assessment of significant coronary stenoses, while the high-pitch mode further significantly lowers the radiation dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20538669     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2009.189100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  64 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-gating in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Kwan-Hoong Ng
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Accuracy of automated attenuation-based 3-dimensional segmentation: in the analysis of left ventricular function compared with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Harald Brodoefel; Ilias Tsiflikas; Ulrich Kramer; Nina Lang; Anja Reimann; Christoph Burgstahler; Claus D Claussen; Martin Heuschmid
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography - what has been achieved and what needs to be done.

Authors:  Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Accuracy, image quality and radiation dose comparison of high-pitch spiral and sequential acquisition on 128-slice dual-source CT angiography in children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Pei Nie; Ximing Wang; Zhaoping Cheng; Xiaopeng Ji; Yanhua Duan; Jiuhong Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Paediatric cardiac computed tomography: a review of imaging techniques and radiation dose consideration.

Authors:  Carolyn Young; Andrew M Taylor; Catherine M Owens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Coronary CT angiography: Diagnostic value and clinical challenges.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

Review 7.  Coronary CT angiography: Dose reduction strategies.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

8.  Radiation dose reduction in pediatric cardiac computed tomography: experience from a tertiary medical center.

Authors:  Brian B Ghoshhajra; Ashley M Lee; Leif-Christopher Engel; Csilla Celeng; Mannudeep K Kalra; Thomas J Brady; Udo Hoffmann; Sjirk J Westra; Suhny Abbara
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 9.  Cardiac hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-triggering: an effective alternative to invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.