Pei Nie1, Ximing Wang, Zhaoping Cheng, Xiaopeng Ji, Yanhua Duan, Jiuhong Chen. 1. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardio-cerebral Vascular Diseases, Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Shandong University, No.324, Jingwu Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250021, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare accuracy, image quality and radiation dose between high-pitch spiral and sequential modes on 128-slice dual-source computed tomographic (DSCT) angiography in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Forty patients suspected with CHD underwent 128-slice DSCT angiography with high-pitch mode and sequential mode respectively. All the anomalies were confirmed by the surgical and/or the conventional cardiac angiography (CCA) findings. The diagnostic accuracy, the subjective and objective image quality and effective radiation doses were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy (χ ( 2 ) = 0.963, P > 0.05), the objective parameters for image quality (P > 0.05) and the image quality of great vessels (u = 167.500, P > 0.05) between the two groups. The image quality of intracardiac structures and coronary arteries was significantly better in the sequential mode group than that in the high-pitch group (u = 112.500 and 100.000, P < 0.05). The mean effective dose in high-pitch group (0.17 ± 0.05 mSv) was significantly lower (t = 5.287, P < 0.05) than that in the sequential mode group (0.29 ± 0.09 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: Both the high-pitch and the sequential modes for 128-slice DSCT angiography provide high accuracy for the assessment of CHD in children, while the high-pitch mode, even with some image quality decrease, further significantly lowers the radiation dose. KEY POINTS: • Modern CT provides excellent anatomical detail of congenital heart disease. • Dual source CT systems offer high-pitch spiral and sequential modes. • The high-pitch mode provides high accuracy for the assessment of CHD. • A few images using the high-pitch mode were occasionally slightly degraded. • But the high-pitch mode significantly lowers the radiation dose.
OBJECTIVES: To compare accuracy, image quality and radiation dose between high-pitch spiral and sequential modes on 128-slice dual-source computed tomographic (DSCT) angiography in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Forty patients suspected with CHD underwent 128-slice DSCT angiography with high-pitch mode and sequential mode respectively. All the anomalies were confirmed by the surgical and/or the conventional cardiac angiography (CCA) findings. The diagnostic accuracy, the subjective and objective image quality and effective radiation doses were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy (χ ( 2 ) = 0.963, P > 0.05), the objective parameters for image quality (P > 0.05) and the image quality of great vessels (u = 167.500, P > 0.05) between the two groups. The image quality of intracardiac structures and coronary arteries was significantly better in the sequential mode group than that in the high-pitch group (u = 112.500 and 100.000, P < 0.05). The mean effective dose in high-pitch group (0.17 ± 0.05 mSv) was significantly lower (t = 5.287, P < 0.05) than that in the sequential mode group (0.29 ± 0.09 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: Both the high-pitch and the sequential modes for 128-slice DSCT angiography provide high accuracy for the assessment of CHD in children, while the high-pitch mode, even with some image quality decrease, further significantly lowers the radiation dose. KEY POINTS: • Modern CT provides excellent anatomical detail of congenital heart disease. • Dual source CT systems offer high-pitch spiral and sequential modes. • The high-pitch mode provides high accuracy for the assessment of CHD. • A few images using the high-pitch mode were occasionally slightly degraded. • But the high-pitch mode significantly lowers the radiation dose.
Authors: Fabian Bamberg; Roy Marcus; Wieland Sommer; Florian Schwarz; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christoph R Becker; Maximilian F Reiser; Thorsten R C Johnson Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2010-12-31 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Stephan Achenbach; Tobias Goroll; Martin Seltmann; Tobias Pflederer; Katharina Anders; Dieter Ropers; Werner G Daniel; Michael Uder; Michael Lell; Mohamed Marwan Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-04
Authors: Wieland H Sommer; Jan C Schenzle; Christoph R Becker; Konstantin Nikolaou; Anno Graser; Gisela Michalski; Klement Neumaier; Maximilian F Reiser; Thorsten R C Johnson Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Robert Goetti; Gudrun Feuchtner; Paul Stolzmann; Lotus Desbiolles; Michael Alexander Fischer; Christoph Karlo; Stephan Baumueller; Hans Scheffel; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Robert Goetti; Stephan Baumüller; Gudrun Feuchtner; Paul Stolzmann; Christoph Karlo; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Oliver Rompel; Martin Glöckler; Rolf Janka; Sven Dittrich; Robert Cesnjevar; Michael M Lell; Michael Uder; Matthias Hammon Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2016-01-06
Authors: Kevin Todd Dyer; Anthony Marcus Hlavacek; Felix Gabriel Meinel; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Andrew Douglas McQuiston; Uwe Joseph Schoepf; Nicholas Peter Pietris Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2014-08-21
Authors: Li-Ping Yao; Li Zhang; Ju Mei; Fang-Bao Ding; Hui-Ming Li; Ming Ding; Xin Yang; Xiao-Ming Li; Kun Sun Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: Xian-Feng Chen; Fan Jiang; Lin Li; Yan Chen; Xin Chen; Yan-Yan Jiang; Li Xiang; Xiao-Jing Ma Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: Felix G Meinel; Thomas Henzler; U Joseph Schoepf; Patsy W Park; Walter Huda; James V Spearman; Kevin T Dyer; Anil G Rao; Anthony M Hlavacek Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Christian A Barrera; Hansel J Otero; Ammie M White; David Saul; David M Biko Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 2.357