Literature DB >> 20535482

[Continuous 24 h monitoring of changes in intraocular pressure with the wireless contact lens sensor Triggerfish™. First results in patients].

C Faschinger1, G Mossböck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For many years researchers have been striving for a non-invasive 24 h continuous method of ambulatory intraocular pressure monitoring. A wireless device with a contact lens sensor is now on the market for clinical use, which is not a quantitative measurement of the intraocular pressure but is at least a recording of qualitative changes. These changes of corneal curvature due to changes of the intraocular pressure result in a distinct profile which gives information about fluctuations of the intraocular pressure, the behaviour during supine sleeping time and the 24 h efficacy of glaucoma therapy. We investigated the practicability and tolerability of this device.
METHOD: The sensor is embedded in a soft silicone contact lens and consists of 4 strain gauges. Additionally there is an antenna made out of gold and a microchip. A second antenna is fixed around the eye which sends impulses to the microchip and receives data from the microchip. The data are sent to a recorder via a wire. Measurements are made for 90 s every 8.5 min resulting in 144 measurements within 24 h. Of the 4 strain gauges 2 sense changes in the corneal curvature due to changes of the intraocular pressure. This device was used in 11 patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma.
RESULTS: The result of the 24 h continuous measurement is a pressure profile which may be flat, fluctuating and with no, some or many spikes. We describe 2 examples of profiles from patients with glaucoma. The changes in the profiles were mostly during the sleeping hours in a supine position. Due to the lack of validation of the results it is not known if intermittent spikes are true spikes or artefacts. Practicability was simple and tolerability was reported to be good by all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: For the first time a practicable, well tolerated, non-invasive device for continuous 24 h monitoring of changes of the corneal curvature due to changes of the intraocular pressure is available. It is not a direct measurement of the intraocular pressure. The resulting profile gives additional information about the behaviour of the intraocular pressure, especially during out-of-office times and night times. Disadvantages are the high cost of the contact lens sensor and the lack of validation of the results and reproducibility in patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20535482     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-010-2198-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  11 in total

Review 1.  Intraocular pressure fluctuations: how much do they matter?

Authors:  Kuldev Singh; Anurag Shrivastava
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  The circadian curve of intraocular pressure: can we estimate its characteristics during office hours?

Authors:  Paolo Fogagnolo; Nicola Orzalesi; Antonio Ferreras; Luca Rossetti
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Wireless contact lens sensor for intraocular pressure monitoring: assessment on enucleated pig eyes.

Authors:  Matteo Leonardi; Elie M Pitchon; Arnaud Bertsch; Philippe Renaud; André Mermoud
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Effect of hospitalization on intraocular pressure in patients with high tension and normal tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Timo Haufschild; Selim Orgül; Josef Flammer
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial.

Authors:  Boel Bengtsson; M Cristina Leske; Leslie Hyman; Anders Heijl
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  First steps toward noninvasive intraocular pressure monitoring with a sensing contact lens.

Authors:  Matteo Leonardi; Peter Leuenberger; Daniel Bertrand; Arnaud Bertsch; Philippe Renaud
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  [Continuous intraocular pressure measurement: First results with a pressure-sensitive contact lens].

Authors:  A Hediger; C Kniestedt; S Zweifel; P Knecht; J Funk; H Kanngiesser
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 8.  Risk factors for glaucoma onset and progression.

Authors:  Anne L Coleman; Stefano Miglior
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 9.  Risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma progression: what we know and what we need to know.

Authors:  Jorge L Rivera; Nicholas P Bell; Robert M Feldman
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study.

Authors:  Joseph Caprioli; Anne L Coleman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  [Sources of error in Goldmann applanation tonometry].

Authors:  F Rüfer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Real-Time In Vivo Intraocular Pressure Monitoring using an Optomechanical Implant and an Artificial Neural Network.

Authors:  Kun Ho Kim; Jeong Oen Lee; Juan Du; David Sretavan; Hyuck Choo
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.301

3.  Evaluation of the effect of daily activities on intraocular pressure in healthy people: is the 20 mmHg border safe?

Authors:  Gonen Baser; Eyyup Karahan; Sinan Bilgin; Ugur Unsal
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 4.  An overview of home tonometry and telemetry for intraocular pressure monitoring in humans.

Authors:  Edward Yung; Valerie Trubnik; L Jay Katz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Chau-Minh Phan; Hendrik Walther; Huayi Gao; Jordan Rossy; Lakshman N Subbaraman; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Blink-sensing glasses: A flexible iontronic sensing wearable for continuous blink monitoring.

Authors:  Rui Chen; Zhichao Zhang; Ka Deng; Dahu Wang; Hongmin Ke; Li Cai; Chi-Wei Chang; Tingrui Pan
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-04-03

Review 7.  Noninvasive intraocular pressure monitoring: current insights.

Authors:  Stefan De Smedt
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-30

8.  A microscale optical implant for continuous in vivo monitoring of intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Jeong Oen Lee; Haeri Park; Juan Du; Ashwin Balakrishna; Oliver Chen; David Sretavan; Hyuck Choo
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 7.127

Review 9.  Promising Approach in the Treatment of Glaucoma Using Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine-Based Systems.

Authors:  Fidiniaina Rina Juliana; Samuel Kesse; Kofi Oti Boakye-Yiadom; Hanitrarimalala Veroniaina; Huihui Wang; Meihao Sun
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.