Literature DB >> 20532884

Effect of posterior design changes on postoperative flexion angle in cruciate retaining mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Shigeyoshi Tsuji1, Tetsuya Tomita, Hideo Hashimoto, Masakazu Fujii, Hideki Yoshikawa, Kazuomi Sugamoto.   

Abstract

The Dual Bearing Knee (DBK) prosthesis is a new concept which has a mobile-bearing insert. In May 2001, the posterior femoral condyle design of the DBK was changed to become smaller and there was a posterior shift in the base of the insert dish (Hi-Flex). Between 1998 and 2004, 371 DBKs (112 Hi-Flex and 220 Standard) were performed by one surgical team. There was a significant difference in postoperative flexion angle between the Hi-Flex and Standard DBKs (117.0° and 111.3°; p = 0.001). The delta flexion angle in the Hi-Flex (-2.4°) was significantly increased compared with that in the Standard DBK (-9.6°) (p = 0.001). In the Hi-Flex DBK, the postoperative flexion angle (5.7°) and the delta flexion angle (7.2°) were significantly larger than for the Standard DBK (p < 0.001). These results suggest that the flexion is greater for a design with smaller posterior condyle prosthesis and with a posterior shift in the base of the insert dish in CR mobile-bearing TKA.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20532884      PMCID: PMC3080484          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1060-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  15 in total

1.  Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset.

Authors:  J Bellemans; S Banks; J Victor; H Vandenneucker; A Moemans
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-01

2.  Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis.

Authors:  Merrill A Ritter; Leesa D Harty; Kenneth E Davis; John B Meding; Michael E Berend
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The P.F.C. sigma RP-F total knee arthroplasty: designed for improved performance.

Authors:  Amar S Ranawat; Sanjay K Gupta; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Functional outcome of PFC Sigma fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Birgit Hanusch; Thai Nurn Lou; Gary Warriner; Anthony Hui; Paul Gregg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis.

Authors:  H E Figgie; V M Goldberg; K G Heiple; H S Moller; N H Gordon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Range of motion in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Y S Anouchi; M McShane; F Kelly; J Elting; J Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Factors influencing the postoperative range of motion in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Ryu; S Saito; K Yamamoto; S Sano
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  1993

8.  Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up.

Authors:  R L Barrack; A J Bertot; M W Wolfe; D A Waldman; M Milicic; L Myers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  In vivo kinematics of mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty in deep knee bending motion.

Authors:  Tetsu Watanabe; Takaharu Yamazaki; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Tetsuya Tomita; Hideo Hashimoto; Daisuke Maeda; Shinichi Tamura; Takahiro Ochi; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Total condylar knee replacement. A study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty.

Authors:  D J Schurman; J N Parker; D Ornstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  7 in total

1.  In vivo function of posterior cruciate ligament before and after posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bing Yue; Kartik M Varadarajan; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparative study of tibial posterior slope angle following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty using one of three implants.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Jung Ho Noh; Seong Cheol Moon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  High-flexion TKA in patients with a minimum of 120 degrees of pre-operative knee flexion: outcomes at six years of follow-up.

Authors:  Aree Tanavalee; Srihatach Ngarmukos; Saran Tantavisut; Arak Limtrakul
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Is the effect of a posterior cruciate ligament resection in total knee arthroplasty predictable?

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; Peer Eysel; Dietmar P König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Partial versus Intact Posterior Cruciate Ligament-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study of Early Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Tie-Bing Qu; Yong Hai; Yuan Lin; Jiang Pan; Zhi-Wei Wang; Liang Wen
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  The Columbus Knee System: 4-Year Results of a New Deep Flexion Design Compared to the NexGen Full Flex Implant.

Authors:  D Goebel; W Schultz
Journal:  Arthritis       Date:  2012-03-07

7.  Pigmented villonodular synovitis does not influence the outcomes following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a case-control study with minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Yike Dai; Jinghui Niu; Guangmin Yang; Ming Li; Fei Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.