Literature DB >> 19898821

Functional outcome of PFC Sigma fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled trial.

Birgit Hanusch1, Thai Nurn Lou, Gary Warriner, Anthony Hui, Paul Gregg.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in functional outcome between the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee replacement systems. One hundred twenty patients were randomised to receive either a fixed-bearing or rotating-platform PFC Sigma total knee replacement. Range of movement (ROM), Oxford knee score (OKS) and Knee Society score (KSS) were assessed independently before and one year after surgery. Weight-bearing X-rays were taken immediately and one year post surgery to determine the incidence of osteolysis and loosening. At a mean follow-up of 13.4 months there was no statistically significant difference in mean ROM, OKS and KSS between the two groups. There was no evidence of osteolysis or loosening in either of the groups and no revision for infection or implant failure. This study shows that there is no statistically significant difference in functional outcome between the two types of implants at short-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19898821      PMCID: PMC2899289          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0901-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements.

Authors:  F F Buechel; F F Buechel; M J Pappas; J D'Alessio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty for post-operative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  W Jacobs; P Anderson; J Limbeek; A Wymenga
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

3.  Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study.

Authors:  Steven T Woolson; Gregory D Northrop
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.

Authors:  F C Ewald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A J Price; J L Rees; D Beard; E Juszczak; S Carter; S White; R de Steiger; C A F Dodd; M Gibbons; P McLardy-Smith; J W Goodfellow; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-01

7.  Difficulties with bearing dislocation and breakage using a movable bearing total knee replacement system.

Authors:  J K Weaver; R S Derkash; A S Greenwald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: short-term results.

Authors:  Amar S Ranawat; Roberto Rossi; Ivano Loreti; Vijay J Rasquinha; Jose A Rodriguez; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Dislocation/subluxation of meniscal bearing elements after New Jersey low-contact stress total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J M Bert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Patients with fixed flexion deformity after total knee arthroplasty do just as well as those without: ten-year prospective data.

Authors:  Kenneth Cheng; David Ridley; Jackie Bird; Gordon McLeod
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  20 in total

1.  Effect of posterior design changes on postoperative flexion angle in cruciate retaining mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shigeyoshi Tsuji; Tetsuya Tomita; Hideo Hashimoto; Masakazu Fujii; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  High-flexion TKA in patients with a minimum of 120 degrees of pre-operative knee flexion: outcomes at six years of follow-up.

Authors:  Aree Tanavalee; Srihatach Ngarmukos; Saran Tantavisut; Arak Limtrakul
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Analysis of differences in bone removal during femoral box osteotomy for primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Angelo Graceffa; Pier Francesco Indelli; Kaitlyn Basnett; Massimiliano Marcucci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-07-08

Review 4.  Rotating-platform TKA no different from fixed-bearing TKA regarding survivorship or performance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [5-year follow-up of 210 Columbus knee prostheses : A prospective multicentre study].

Authors:  Andreas Fuchs; Philip Häussermann; Dirk Hömig; Björn Gunnar Ochs; Christof A Müller; Peter Helwig; Lukas Konstantinidis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B L Fransen; D C van Duijvenbode; M J M Hoozemans; B J Burger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Total versus unicompartmental knee replacement for isolated lateral osteoarthritis: a matched-pairs study.

Authors:  Tilman Walker; Tobias Gotterbarm; Thomas Bruckner; Christian Merle; Marcus R Streit
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Minimum twelve-year follow-up of fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Double blinded randomized trial.

Authors:  Cameron J Killen; Michael P Murphy; William J Hopkinson; Melvyn A Harrington; William H Adams; Harold W Rees
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-03-29

9.  Factors affecting range of motion in total knee arthroplasty using high flexion prosthesis: A prospective study.

Authors:  Kantilal H Sancheti; Parag K Sancheti; Ashok K Shyam; Rajeev Joshi; Kailash Patil; Anubhav Jain
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty with a mean five-year follow-up: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mengqi Cheng; Desheng Chen; Yongyuan Guo; Chen Zhu; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.