Literature DB >> 27627716

Partial versus Intact Posterior Cruciate Ligament-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study of Early Clinical Outcomes.

Bo Zhang1, Cheng-Kung Cheng2,3, Tie-Bing Qu4, Yong Hai5, Yuan Lin1, Jiang Pan1, Zhi-Wei Wang1, Liang Wen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Whether the entire posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) should be retained during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR TKA) is controversial. The goal of this study was to compare the early clinical outcomes of partial versus intact PCL-retaining TKA.
METHODS: Ninety-two patients who had undergone unilateral CR TKA from March 2012 to June 2013 were enrolled in this study. Forty-six of these patients were randomly selected to undergo intact PCL-retaining TKA (intact group), whereas the remaining 46 patients underwent tibial osteotomy together with anterolateral bundle and bone island resection (partial group). All operations were performed by a senior orthopedic surgeon and the PCL was released to some extent in both groups. After TKA, active and passive flexion and extension exercises of the knee and lower limb strength exercises were maintained until at least 3 months after surgery. Before surgery and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, range of motion, Knee Society Clinical Rating System scores (including clinical and functional scores of the knee) and maximum anteroposterior (AP) displacement of the knee at 30° and 90° of knee flexion were evaluated in both groups.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients were rejected from the final analysis because of loss to follow-up or development of complications. Thus, 40 patients from the partial group and 38 from the intact group were followed up for 24-41 months (mean 32.8 months). Knee functional scores were significantly higher in the intact than in the partial group (88.1 vs. 84.8 points) 24 months after surgery There were no significant differences in range of motion or knee clinical scores between the two groups at any time point. However, 12 and 24 months after surgery, the mean maximum AP displacement of the knee in 90° knee flexion was significantly greater in the partial than in the intact group (12 months: 6.3 vs. 5.7 mm; 24 months: 7.0 vs. 6.2 mm).
CONCLUSION: Double-bundle PCL plays an important role in maintaining knee stability; the entire PCL should therefore be retained during CR TKA.
© 2016 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bundles; Cruciate retaining; Posterior cruciate ligament; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27627716      PMCID: PMC6584116          DOI: 10.1111/os.12269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.071


  20 in total

1.  In vivo function of posterior cruciate ligament before and after posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bing Yue; Kartik M Varadarajan; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Soft tissue tension in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Seiji Kubo; Takehiko Matsushita; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Effect of posterior design changes on postoperative flexion angle in cruciate retaining mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shigeyoshi Tsuji; Tetsuya Tomita; Hideo Hashimoto; Masakazu Fujii; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  High-flexion vs conventional prostheses total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shi-Xing Luo; Wei Su; Jin-Min Zhao; Ke Sha; Qing-Jun Wei; Xiao-Feng Li
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Function of posterior cruciate ligament bundles during in vivo knee flexion.

Authors:  Ramprasad Papannagari; Louis E DeFrate; Kyung W Nha; Jeremy M Moses; Mohamed Moussa; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  In vivo determination of total knee arthroplasty kinematics: a multicenter analysis of an asymmetrical posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard D Komistek; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Kim C Bertin; Aaron Rosenberg; William Kennedy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Gait analysis comparison of cruciate retaining and substituting TKA following PCL sacrifice.

Authors:  Siddharth Joglekar; Terence J Gioe; Patrick Yoon; Michael H Schwartz
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Do high flexion posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty designs increase knee flexion? A meta analysis.

Authors:  Takanobu Sumino; Hemanth R Gadikota; Kartik M Varadarajan; Young-Min Kwon; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Is the posterior cruciate ligament destabilized after the tibial cut in a cruciate retaining total knee replacement? An anatomical study.

Authors:  Barthelemy Liabaud; David A Patrick; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Differences in knee joint kinematics and forces after posterior cruciate retaining and stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Wünschel; Jeremi M Leasure; Philipp Dalheimer; Nicole Kraft; Nikolaus Wülker; Otto Müller
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intact, pie-crusting and repairing the posterior cruciate ligament in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty: A 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  De-Si Ma; Liang Wen; Zhi-Wei Wang; Bo Zhang; Shi-Xiang Ren; Yuan Lin
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  A surgical reduction technique for posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison study.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Jinghui Niu; Yike Dai; Huaxing Zhang; Jing Zhu; Fei Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.