Literature DB >> 22143313

Comparative study of tibial posterior slope angle following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty using one of three implants.

Dae Kyung Bae1, Sang Jun Song, Kyoung Ho Yoon, Jung Ho Noh, Seong Cheol Moon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pre- and postoperative tibial posterior slope angles (PSAs) were assessed in patients who underwent cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 386 cruciate retaining TKA were performed in 308 patients and retrospectively reviewed. Based on the prostheses, 202 cases using NexGen were classified as group I, 120 cases using PFC sigma as group II, and 64 cases using Vanguard as group III. Postoperative PSA of groups I, II, and III were compared.
RESULTS: In groups I, II, and III, postoperative PSA was 6.0˚, 6.0˚, and 4.5˚, respectively (p < 0.001). Between preoperative measurement and final follow-up examination, mean knee score (59.7 to 97.3), function score (54.2 to 90.5), and range of motion (ROM; 126.7° to 132.2°) improved. These three values did not differ significantly among groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3° slope of the Vanguard polyethylene insert caused the difference in PSAs. This design characteristic should be considered when using this implant in TKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22143313      PMCID: PMC3311819          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1395-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  27 in total

1.  Posterior slope of tibial plateau in Chinese.

Authors:  K Y Chiu; S D Zhang; G H Zhang
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Effects of increasing tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee.

Authors:  J Robert Giffin; Tracy M Vogrin; Thore Zantop; Savio L Y Woo; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  How much tibial resection is required in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; György Csécsei; Jochen Nessler; Peer Eysel; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. A computer analysis.

Authors:  P S Walker; A Garg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings.

Authors:  F F Buechel; M J Pappas
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  L D Dorr; R A Boiardo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The effect of posterior tibial slope on knee stability after Ortholoc total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  L A Whiteside; D D Amador
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  The surgical technique for performing a total knee replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  R S Laskin; M A Riegèr
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Effect of tibial slope or posterior cruciate ligament release on knee kinematics.

Authors:  Hiroshi Jojima; Leo A Whiteside; Kosuke Ogata
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  9 in total

1.  Using fibula as a reference can be beneficial for the tibial component alignment after total knee arthroplasty, a retrospective study.

Authors:  Mehmet Erdem; Deniz Gulabi; Gultekin Sitki Cecen; Cem Coskun Avci; Murat Asci; Fevzi Saglam
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Intraoperative factors affecting conversion from cruciate retaining to cruciate substituting in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kang Il Kim; Dong Hur; Hyun Ho Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Reduced operating time but not blood loss with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dinu Vermesan; Ilie Trocan; Radu Prejbeanu; Dan V Poenaru; Horia Haragus; Damian Gratian; Massimo Marrelli; Francesco Inchingolo; Monica Caprio; Raffaele Cagiano; Marco Tatullo
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-12-29

4.  Proximal tibial morphology and risk of posterior tibial cortex impingement in patients with AA-sized Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty tibial implants.

Authors:  Jiun-Ran Charng; Alvin Chao-Yu Chen; Yi-Shen Chan; Kuo Yao Hsu; Chen-Te Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Effects of different prosthetic instrumentations on tibial bone resection in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yufeng Lu; Xuechao Yuan; Feng Qiao; Yangquan Hao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The initial learning curve for the ROSA® Knee System can be achieved in 6-11 cases for operative time and has similar 90-day complication rates with improved implant alignment compared to manual instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luc Vanlommel; Enrico Neven; Mike B Anderson; Liesbeth Bruckers; Jan Truijen
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-12-20

7.  Accuracies of bone resection, implant position, and limb alignment in robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-centre study.

Authors:  Chenkai Li; Zian Zhang; Guanrong Wang; Chun Rong; Wanping Zhu; Xinzhe Lu; Yikai Liu; Haining Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Changes in Femoral Posterior Condylar Offset, Tibial Posterior Slope Angle, and Joint Line Height after Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Dae Kyung Bae; Kang Il Kim; Ho Yeon Jeong
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-29

9.  A computational simulation study to determine the biomechanical influence of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K-T Kang; Y-G Koh; J Son; O-R Kwon; J-S Lee; S K Kwon
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.853

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.