Ming Chao1, Yaoqin Xie, Eduardo G Moros, Quynh-Thu Le, Lei Xing. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, California 94305-5847, USA. mchao@uams.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Understanding the kinetics of tumor growth/shrinkage represents a critical step in quantitative assessment of therapeutics and realization of adaptive radiation therapy. This article presents a novel framework for image-based modeling of tumor change and demonstrates its performance with synthetic images and clinical cases. METHODS: Due to significant tumor tissue content changes, similarity-based models are not suitable for describing the process of tumor volume changes. Under the hypothesis that tissue features in a tumor volume or at the boundary region are partially preserved, the kinetic change was modeled in two steps: (1) Autodetection of homologous tissue features shared by two input images using the scale invariance feature transformation (SIFT) method; and (2) establishment of a voxel-to-voxel correspondence between the images for the remaining spatial points by interpolation. The correctness of the tissue feature correspondence was assured by a bidirectional association procedure, where SIFT features were mapped from template to target images and reversely. A series of digital phantom experiments and five head and neck clinical cases were used to assess the performance of the proposed technique. RESULTS: The proposed technique can faithfully identify the known changes introduced when constructing the digital phantoms. The subsequent feature-guided thin plate spline calculation reproduced the "ground truth" with accuracy better than 1.5 mm. For the clinical cases, the new algorithm worked reliably for a volume change as large as 30%. CONCLUSIONS: An image-based tumor kinetic algorithm was developed to model the tumor response to radiation therapy. The technique provides a practical framework for future application in adaptive radiation therapy.
PURPOSE: Understanding the kinetics of tumor growth/shrinkage represents a critical step in quantitative assessment of therapeutics and realization of adaptive radiation therapy. This article presents a novel framework for image-based modeling of tumor change and demonstrates its performance with synthetic images and clinical cases. METHODS: Due to significant tumor tissue content changes, similarity-based models are not suitable for describing the process of tumor volume changes. Under the hypothesis that tissue features in a tumor volume or at the boundary region are partially preserved, the kinetic change was modeled in two steps: (1) Autodetection of homologous tissue features shared by two input images using the scale invariance feature transformation (SIFT) method; and (2) establishment of a voxel-to-voxel correspondence between the images for the remaining spatial points by interpolation. The correctness of the tissue feature correspondence was assured by a bidirectional association procedure, where SIFT features were mapped from template to target images and reversely. A series of digital phantom experiments and five head and neck clinical cases were used to assess the performance of the proposed technique. RESULTS: The proposed technique can faithfully identify the known changes introduced when constructing the digital phantoms. The subsequent feature-guided thin plate spline calculation reproduced the "ground truth" with accuracy better than 1.5 mm. For the clinical cases, the new algorithm worked reliably for a volume change as large as 30%. CONCLUSIONS: An image-based tumor kinetic algorithm was developed to model the tumor response to radiation therapy. The technique provides a practical framework for future application in adaptive radiation therapy.
Authors: Laurence E Court; Lei Dong; Andrew K Lee; Rex Cheung; Mark D Bonnen; Jennifer O'Daniel; He Wang; Radhe Mohan; Deborah Kuban Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Eric K Hansen; M Kara Bucci; Jeanne M Quivey; Vivian Weinberg; Ping Xia Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-10-26 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: K M Langen; S L Meeks; D O Poole; T H Wagner; T R Willoughby; P A Kupelian; K J Ruchala; J Haimerl; G H Olivera Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2005-08-31 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: M I Koukourakis; S Koukouraki; A Giatromanolaki; S C Archimandritis; J Skarlatos; K Beroukas; J G Bizakis; G Retalis; N Karkavitsas; E S Helidonis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A T C Chan; P M L Teo; R K Ngan; T W Leung; W H Lau; B Zee; S F Leung; F Y Cheung; W Yeo; H H Yiu; K H Yu; K W Chiu; D T Chan; T Mok; K T Yuen; F Mo; M Lai; W H Kwan; P Choi; P J Johnson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-04-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Lian; L Xing; S Hunjan; C Dumoulin; J Levin; A Lo; R Watkins; K Rohling; R Giaquinto; D Kim; D Spielman; B Daniel Journal: Med Phys Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Mark Oldham; Daniel Létourneau; Lindsay Watt; Geoffrey Hugo; Di Yan; David Lockman; Leonard H Kim; Peter Y Chen; Alvaro Martinez; John W Wong Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Daniel Létourneau; John W Wong; Mark Oldham; Misbah Gulam; Lindsay Watt; David A Jaffray; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Alvaro A Martinez Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Jerry L Barker; Adam S Garden; K Kian Ang; Jennifer C O'Daniel; He Wang; Laurence E Court; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; K S Clifford Chao; Susan L Tucker; Radhe Mohan; Lei Dong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Stephen R Bowen; Richard J Chappell; Søren M Bentzen; Michael A Deveau; Lisa J Forrest; Robert Jeraj Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-06-08 Impact factor: 6.280