Literature DB >> 25672617

Why do people participate in epidemiological research?

Claudia Slegers1, Deborah Zion, Deborah Glass, Helen Kelsall, Lin Fritschi, Ngiare Brown, Bebe Loff.   

Abstract

Many assumptions are made about public willingness to participate in epidemiological research, yet few empirical studies have been conducted to ascertain whether such assumptions are correct. Our qualitative study of the public and of expert stakeholders leads us to suggest that people are generally prepared to participate in epidemiological research, particularly if it is conducted by a trusted public institution such as a government health department, charity, or university. However, there is widespread community distrust of research conducted or sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. Individuals are prompted to take part if the study concerns an illness they or a family member or friend have personally experienced or if they believe the research will confer a widespread public benefit. Preferences vary about the mode of contact for the research to be conducted. Willingness to participate in telephone surveys has decreased in recent years, and this may be a consequence of an increase in calls to homes by telemarketers and market researchers. Participants also stressed the importance of knowing where their names and contact details were sourced and suggested that this information be available to prospective study participants as a matter of course in the first approach or letter. We provide valuable information to epidemiologists in designing studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25672617     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-015-9611-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  23 in total

1.  Researching Aboriginal health: experience from a study of urban young people's health and well-being.

Authors:  Wendy Holmes; Paul Stewart; Anne Garrow; Ian Anderson; Lisa Thorpe
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Generating best evidence from qualitative research: the role of data analysis.

Authors:  Julie Green; Karen Willis; Emma Hughes; Rhonda Small; Nicky Welch; Lisa Gibbs; Jeanne Daly
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.939

3.  The obligation to participate in biomedical research.

Authors:  G Owen Schaefer; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Alan Wertheimer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Volunteer research subjects' experience of participation in research on a novel diagnostic technology for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norma Morris; Margaret Schneider
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2009-11-25

5.  Attitudes of urban American Indians and Alaska Natives regarding participation in research.

Authors:  Dedra Buchwald; Veronica Mendoza-Jenkins; Calvin Croy; Helen McGough; Marjorie Bezdek; Paul Spicer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  African Americans' views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.

Authors:  V S Freimuth; S C Quinn; S B Thomas; G Cole; E Zook; T Duncan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Making epidemiologic studies responsive to the needs of participants and communities: the Carolina Breast Cancer Study experience.

Authors:  Patricia Plummer; Susan Jackson; Jamie Konarski; Elizabeth Mahanna; Carolyn Dunmore; Georgette Regan; Dianne Mattingly; Barbara Parker; Sara Williams; Catherine Andrews; Vani Vannapppagari; Susan Hall; Sandra Deming; Elizabeth Hodgson; Patricia Moorman; Beth Newman; Robert Millikan
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Maintaining dignity and managing stigma in the interview encounter: the challenge of paid-for participation.

Authors:  Kay Cook; Karl Nunkoosing
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2008-03

9.  Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study.

Authors:  M R Robling; K Hood; H Houston; R Pill; J Fay; H M Evans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Going the distance: overcoming challenges in recruitment and retention of Black and White women in multisite, longitudinal study of predictors of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Jean C McSweeney; Christina M Pettey; Ellen P Fischer; Alisa Spellman
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 1.571

View more
  17 in total

1.  "Can a Company be Bitchy?" Corporate (and Political and Scientific) Social Responsibility.

Authors:  Leigh E Rich; Michael A Ashby
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Reasons for participation in a child development study: Are cases with developmental diagnoses different from controls?

Authors:  Chyrise B Bradley; Amanda L Tapia; Carolyn G DiGuiseppi; Marti W Kepner; Joy M Kloetzer; Laura A Schieve; Lisa D Wiggins; Gayle C Windham; Julie L Daniels
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.103

3.  A telephone survey of factors affecting willingness to participate in health research surveys.

Authors:  D C Glass; H L Kelsall; C Slegers; A B Forbes; B Loff; D Zion; L Fritschi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Learning from older peoples' reasons for participating in demanding, intensive epidemiological studies: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alicja M Baczynska; Sarah C Shaw; Harnish P Patel; Avan A Sayer; Helen C Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Trust me, I'm a researcher!: The role of trust in biomedical research.

Authors:  Angeliki Kerasidou
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-03

6.  Employing quality control and feedback to the EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol to improve the quality of data collection.

Authors:  Fredrick Dermawan Purba; Joke A M Hunfeld; Aulia Iskandarsyah; Titi Sahidah Fitriana; Sawitri S Sadarjoen; Jan Passchier; Jan J V Busschbach
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Successful adherence and retention to daily monitoring of physical activity: Lessons learned.

Authors:  Xiaomeng Xu; Samantha Tupy; Stephen Robertson; Ashley L Miller; Danielle Correll; Rick Tivis; Claudio R Nigg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Informed Consent for Mobile Phone Health Surveys in Colombia: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Mariana Rodriguez-Patarroyo; Angelica Torres-Quintero; Andres I Vecino-Ortiz; Kristina Hallez; Aixa Natalia Franco-Rodriguez; Eduardo A Rueda Barrera; Stephanie Puerto; Dustin G Gibson; Alain Labrique; George W Pariyo; Joseph Ali
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Willingness to Participate in Longitudinal Research Among People with Chronic Pain Who Take Medical Cannabis: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Marcus A Bachhuber; Julia H Arnsten; Joanna L Starrels; Chinazo O Cunningham
Journal:  Cannabis Cannabinoid Res       Date:  2018-03-01

10.  Predicting participation of people with impaired vision in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Pedro Lima Ramos; Rui Santana; Laura Hernandez Moreno; Ana Patricia Marques; Cristina Freitas; Amandio Rocha-Sousa; Antonio Filipe Macedo
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.