Literature DB >> 32870566

Clinical trials: Predictors of knowledge and attitudes towards participation.

Oriana Awwad1, Sajeda Maaiah1, Basima A Almomani2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Clinical trials (CTs) are critical to advancing of patient care. Understanding the public's knowledge and the attitudes towards participating in CTs is important for their successful implication. In Jordan this data are currently not available. The present study aimed to explore the knowledge, attitude and perception of Jordanians towards CTs participation.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1216 Jordanians recruited from public hospitals and pharmaceutical research centres.
RESULTS: About 20.5% of the respondents have previously participated in a CT. About 68.3% and 50.1% had good knowledge and positive attitude towards CTs, respectively. Good knowledge was associated with male gender (OR = 1.696, 95% CI = 1.284-0.240, P < .001), higher education (OR = 1.433, 95% CI = 1.107-1.856, P = .006) and healthy condition (OR = 1.822, 95% CI = 1.234-2.690, P = .003); while older age was associated with a poor knowledge (OR = 0.985, 95% CI = 0.972-0.998, P = .026). Female gender (OR = 1.817, 95% CI = 1.406-2.349, P < .001), higher education (OR = 1.294, 95% CI = 1.017-1.646, P = .036) and previous participation (OR = 1.919, 95% CI = 1.388-2.653, P < .001) were factors predicting the positive attitudes. A very weak positive correlation was found between knowledge and attitude (Spearman's r = 0.074, P = .01). Regarding perceptions, most of the respondents (85.3%) perceive that CTs are conducted in an ethical manner in Jordan, only 52.9% however feel comfortable towards participation. A moderate positive correlation was found between knowledge and perception (Spearman's r = 0.275, P < .001). Taking part in a CT significantly affect knowledge, attitudes and perceptions.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed important insights regarding knowledge, attitudes and perception of Jordanians towards CTs. Educational interventions can improve awareness of the ethical standards under which CTs are conducted affecting the perception to participate. Promotion of CTs among patients and healthy individuals is needed to increase participation.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32870566      PMCID: PMC7917151          DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   2.503


  29 in total

1.  Public opinions about participating in health research.

Authors:  Kay Teschke; Suhail Marino; Rong Chu; Joseph K C Tsui; M Anne Harris; Stephen A Marion
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

2.  Clinical research law in Jordan: an ethical analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Ramahi; Henry Silverman
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.294

3.  Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research.

Authors:  Seth W Glickman; John G McHutchison; Eric D Peterson; Charles B Cairns; Robert A Harrington; Robert M Califf; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Clinical trials in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: grandstanding or grandeur?

Authors:  Satish Chandrasekhar Nair; Halah Ibrahim; David D Celentano
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  A comparison of patient knowledge of clinical trials and trialist priorities.

Authors:  P Cameron; G R Pond; R Y Xu; P M Ellis; J R Goffin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries- a systematic review.

Authors:  Chalachew Alemayehu; Geoffrey Mitchell; Jane Nikles
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-03-22

Review 7.  Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review.

Authors:  David B Fogel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-08-07

Review 8.  Decision aids for people considering taking part in clinical trials.

Authors:  Katie Gillies; Seonaidh C Cotton; Jamie C Brehaut; Mary C Politi; Zoe Skea
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-27

9.  Attitudes, understanding, and concerns regarding medical research amongst Egyptians: a qualitative pilot study.

Authors:  Susan S Khalil; Henry J Silverman; May Raafat; Samer El-Kamary; Maged El-Setouhy
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Kerry J Manton; Cassandra S Gauld; Katherine M White; Paul M Griffin; Suzanne L Elliott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  Knowledge and attitudes towards clinical trials among women with ovarian cancer: results of the ACTO study.

Authors:  Paola Mosconi; Anna Roberto; Nicoletta Cerana; Nicoletta Colombo; Florence Didier; Maurizio D'Incalci; Domenica Lorusso; Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.506

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.