Literature DB >> 20496170

Psychosocial variables associated with colorectal cancer screening in South Australia.

Stephen R Cole1, Ian Zajac, Tess Gregory, Sarah Mehaffey, Naomi Roosa, Deborah Turnbull, Adrian Esterman, Graeme P Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population screening reduces mortality from colorectal cancer, yet factors associated with uptake of screening are incompletely understood.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine demographic and psychosocial factors associated with participation in faecal occult blood test (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in an average risk community programme in Adelaide, South Australia.
METHOD: A questionnaire consistent with the Preventive Health Model was used to determine demographic and psychosocial differences between previous FOBT-based screening participants (n = 413, response rate 93.2%) and non-participants (n = 481, response rate 47.9%). Results were analysed by univariate and multivariate generalised linear modelling, and factors associated with participation were identified.
RESULTS: Factor analysis of psychosocial items revealed an optimal three-factor solution (knowledge, faecal aversion, belief in the value of screening). Following multivariate analyses, two psychosocial and two demographic factors remained as predictors of FOBT screening behaviour: (1) items related to faecal aversion (Aversion), relative risk (RR) = 0.61, CI = 0.55-0.69, (2) perceptions about the value of screening (Value), RR = 1.45, CI = 1.13-1.85, (3) age band 65-69 (Age, five age bands, relative to age 50-54), RR = 1.43, CI = 1.16-1.76 and FOBT type (Test; three tests, Hemoccult, FlexSure, InSure randomly assigned, relative to Hemoccult: FlexSure: RR = 1.41, CI = 1.17-1.71, InSure: RR = 1.76, CI = 1.47-2.11.
CONCLUSIONS: The psychosocial factors associated with non-participation in FOBT-based CRC screening are amenable to interventions designed to improve participation. The small relative risks values associated with each predictor, however, raise the possibility that additional factors are likely to influence screening participation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20496170     DOI: 10.1007/s12529-010-9101-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Med        ISSN: 1070-5503


  40 in total

Review 1.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

2.  Self change processes, self efficacy and decisional balance across five stages of smoking cessation.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; C C DiClemente
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1984

3.  Factors affecting compliance with colorectal cancer screening in France: differences between intention to participate and actual participation.

Authors:  C Herbert; G Launoy; M Gignoux
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Effect of dietary restriction on participation in faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S R Cole; G P Young
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2001-08-20       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Predicting colon cancer screening behavior from health beliefs.

Authors:  F A Macrae; D J Hill; D J St John; A Ambikapathy; J F Garner
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Colorectal cancer: a survey of community beliefs and behaviours in Victoria.

Authors:  R J Thomas; V A Clarke
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1998-07-06       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  R E Myers; E Ross; C Jepson; T Wolf; A Balshem; L Millner; H Leventhal
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Older women's attitudes to cervical screening and cervical cancer: a New Zealand experience.

Authors:  G E White
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  Knowledge, attitude and intentions related to colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood tests in a rural Australian population.

Authors:  Monika Janda; Warren R Stanton; Karen Hughes; Christopher Del Mar; Alexandra Clavarino; Joanne F Aitken; Shilu Tong; Leonie Short; Barbara Leggett; Beth Newman
Journal:  Asia Pac J Public Health       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.399

View more
  14 in total

1.  Editorial for International Journal of Behavioral Medicine: special issue on cancer.

Authors:  Michael H Antoni
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2011-12

2.  Self-reported bowel screening rates in older Australians and the implications for public health screening programs.

Authors:  Ian T Zajac; Ingrid Flight; Deborah Turnbull; Graeme Young; Steve Cole; Carlene Wilson
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2013-08-31

3.  Patient Beliefs About Colon Cancer Screening.

Authors:  John W Ely; Barcey T Levy; Jeanette Daly; Yinghui Xu
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Self-perceived Mental Health Status and Uptake of Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Celestin Hategekimana; Mohammad Karamouzian
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-02-12

5.  Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tess A Gregory; Carlene Wilson; Amy Duncan; Deborah Turnbull; Stephen R Cole; Graeme Young
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  A randomised controlled trial of personalised decision support delivered via the internet for bowel cancer screening with a faecal occult blood test: the effects of tailoring of messages according to social cognitive variables on participation.

Authors:  Carlene J Wilson; Ingrid Hk Flight; Deborah Turnbull; Tess Gregory; Stephen R Cole; Graeme P Young; Ian T Zajac
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study.

Authors:  Nancy P Gordon; Beverly B Green
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Responses to procedural information about colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: the role of consideration of future consequences.

Authors:  Christian von Wagner; Anna Good; Samuel G Smith; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Predictors of colorectal cancer screening intention among Iranian adults: an application of the preventive health model.

Authors:  F Besharati; A Karimi-Shahanjarini; S M M Hazavehie; S Bashirian; J Faradmal
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2018-06-01

10.  Decision Support and the Effectiveness of Web-based Delivery and Information Tailoring for Bowel Cancer Screening: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Ingrid H Flight; Carlene J Wilson; Ian T Zajac; Elizabeth Hart; Jane A McGillivray
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2012-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.