Literature DB >> 9695701

Colorectal cancer: a survey of community beliefs and behaviours in Victoria.

R J Thomas1, V A Clarke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document self-reported beliefs and behaviours in relation to colorectal cancer (CRC) and screening for CRC. DATA COLLECTION: A stratified random sample was selected from the telephone directory, and structured telephone interviews were conducted using a computer-assisted telephone interviewing system. PARTICIPANTS: 500 men and 500 women aged 40-60 years, 70% randomly selected from the Melbourne metropolitan area and 30% from rural Victoria. The response rate to the initial telephone invitation of 1569 eligible people was 63.7%. OUTCOME MEASURES: Awareness of and experience with CRC; knowledge of CRC risk, risk reduction behaviour, and screening tests for CRC; willingness to have screening tests for CRC; and test preferences.
RESULTS: The people surveyed were relatively unaware of their personal risk of CRC, despite 61% (95% CI, 57%-65%) knowing someone who had CRC. Although 51% (95% CI, 48%-54%) could not name any CRC screening test, 68% (95% CI, 65%-71%) knew of the value of a high fibre diet in prevention. However, 67% (95% CI, 64%-70%) thought it was unlikely they would have a screening test for CRC in the next two years, but 64% (95% CI, 61%-67%) considered that some person could influence their decision to have a test, 60% (95% CI, 56%-64%) stating that they would be influenced by a doctor. Faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy were equally acceptable. In general, women were more knowledgeable than men. There were no systematic age or urban/rural differences.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a variable understanding of CRC in the community. Although prevention is well understood, this is not true of screening. General practitioners are likely to be influential in the uptake of any screening programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9695701     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb141476.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  6 in total

1.  Cost sharing and hereditary cancer risk: predictors of willingness-to-pay for genetic testing.

Authors:  Jennifer M Matro; Karen J Ruth; Yu-Ning Wong; Katen C McCully; Christina M Rybak; Neal J Meropol; Michael J Hall
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Colorectal cancer screening using the faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a survey of GP attitudes and practices in the UK.

Authors:  Sarah Damery; Sue Clifford; Sue Wilson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Screening practices of Australian men and women categorized as "at or slightly above average risk" of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Trevor Lockett; Alex Boussioutas; Louise Keogh; Louisa B Flander; Ingrid Winship; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Psychosocial variables associated with colorectal cancer screening in South Australia.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Ian Zajac; Tess Gregory; Sarah Mehaffey; Naomi Roosa; Deborah Turnbull; Adrian Esterman; Graeme P Young
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2011-12

5.  Bowel cancer screening in England: a qualitative study of GPs' attitudes and information needs.

Authors:  Chris Woodrow; Linda Rozmovits; Paul Hewitson; Peter Rose; Joan Austoker; Eila Watson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of risk.

Authors:  Ryan J Courtney; Christine L Paul; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Finlay A Macrae; Mariko L Carey; John Attia; Mark McEvoy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.