S R Cole1, G P Young. 1. Bowel Health Service, Repatriation General Hospital, Adelaide, SA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine if participation in colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is affected by a restrictive diet and if it is associated with certain demographic variables. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 1,203 residents of South Australia aged 50-69 years, with no "currently active bowel disease", randomly selected from a database of people willing to be contacted about unspecified health issues. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial: participants were offered screening by immunochemical FOBT by mail in 1998. Half were randomly allocated to a group instructed to follow a low-peroxidase diet, as required for guaiac FOBT, while the other group was not so restricted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effect of diet restriction on participation (return of correctly completed FOBT sample cards within 15 weeks); time taken to return cards; relationships between participation and demographic variables. RESULTS:Participation rates were 65.9% (no-diet group) and 53.3% (diet group) (difference, 12.6%; 95% CI, 7.1%-18.1%). In the first week, rates of return as a proportion of all tests returned were 13.1% (no-diet) and 1.6% (diet) (difference, 11.5%; 95% CI, 8.6%-14.4%), increasing to 54.3% and 44.5%, respectively, after five weeks (difference, 9.8%; 95% CI, 4.2%-15.4%). Participation was significantly associated with older age (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.78), but not sex, Index of Social Disadvantage or rural versus urban address. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary restrictions create a barrier to FOBT-based screening for colorectal cancer. The use of immunochemical rather than guaiac FOBT removes this barrier.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To determine if participation in colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is affected by a restrictive diet and if it is associated with certain demographic variables. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 1,203 residents of South Australia aged 50-69 years, with no "currently active bowel disease", randomly selected from a database of people willing to be contacted about unspecified health issues. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial: participants were offered screening by immunochemical FOBT by mail in 1998. Half were randomly allocated to a group instructed to follow a low-peroxidase diet, as required for guaiac FOBT, while the other group was not so restricted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effect of diet restriction on participation (return of correctly completed FOBT sample cards within 15 weeks); time taken to return cards; relationships between participation and demographic variables. RESULTS: Participation rates were 65.9% (no-diet group) and 53.3% (diet group) (difference, 12.6%; 95% CI, 7.1%-18.1%). In the first week, rates of return as a proportion of all tests returned were 13.1% (no-diet) and 1.6% (diet) (difference, 11.5%; 95% CI, 8.6%-14.4%), increasing to 54.3% and 44.5%, respectively, after five weeks (difference, 9.8%; 95% CI, 4.2%-15.4%). Participation was significantly associated with older age (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.78), but not sex, Index of Social Disadvantage or rural versus urban address. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary restrictions create a barrier to FOBT-based screening for colorectal cancer. The use of immunochemical rather than guaiac FOBT removes this barrier.
Authors: Grace Clarke Hillyer; Karen M Schmitt; Daniel E Freedberg; Rachel A Kramer; Yin Su; Richard M Rosenberg; Alfred I Neugut Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: K Allen Greiner; Christine M Daley; Aaron Epp; Aimee James; Hung-Wen Yeh; Mugur Geana; Wendi Born; Kimberly K Engelman; Jeremy Shellhorn; Christina M Hester; Joseph LeMaster; Daniel C Buckles; Edward F Ellerbeck Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Stephen R Cole; Ian Zajac; Tess Gregory; Sarah Mehaffey; Naomi Roosa; Deborah Turnbull; Adrian Esterman; Graeme P Young Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2011-12
Authors: L Sharp; L Tilson; S Whyte; A O'Ceilleachair; C Walsh; C Usher; P Tappenden; J Chilcott; A Staines; M Barry; H Comber Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Graeme P Young; Erin L Symonds; James E Allison; Stephen R Cole; Callum G Fraser; Stephen P Halloran; Ernst J Kuipers; Helen E Seaman Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 3.199