Literature DB >> 25619196

Patient Beliefs About Colon Cancer Screening.

John W Ely1, Barcey T Levy2,3, Jeanette Daly2, Yinghui Xu2.   

Abstract

Only about half of eligible individuals undergo colon cancer screening. We have limited knowledge about the patient beliefs that adversely affect screening decisions and about which beliefs might be amenable to change through education. As part of a clinical trial, 641 rural Iowans, aged 52 to 79 years, reported their beliefs about colon cancer screening in response to a mailed questionnaire. Consenting subjects were randomized into four groups, which were distinguished by four levels of increasingly intensive efforts to promote screening. Two of the groups received mailed educational materials and completed a follow-up questionnaire, which allowed us to determine whether their beliefs about screening changed following the education. We also completed a factor analysis to identify underlying (latent) factors that might explain the responses to 33 questions about readiness, attitudes, and perceived barriers related to colon cancer screening. The strongest predictors of a patient's stated readiness to be screened were a physician's recommendation to be screened (1 point difference on 10-point Likert scale, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.5 to 1.6 point difference), a family history of colon cancer (0.85-point Likert scale difference, 95 % CI, 0.1 to 1.6), and a belief that health-care decisions should be mostly left to physicians rather than patients (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.21, P < .001). Of the 33 questionnaire items about screening beliefs, 11 (33 %) changed favorably following the educational intervention. In the factor analysis, the 33 items were reduced to 8 underlying factors, such as being too busy to undergo screening and worries about screening procedures. We found a limited number of underlying factors that may help explain patient resistance to colon cancer screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal neoplasms; Factor analysis; Health behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25619196      PMCID: PMC7712459          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-015-0792-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  30 in total

Review 1.  Principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis.

Authors:  I T Joliffe; B J Morgan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Mailed fecal immunochemical tests plus educational materials to improve colon cancer screening rates in Iowa Research Network (IRENE) practices.

Authors:  Barcey T Levy; Jeanette M Daly; Yinghui Xu; John W Ely
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Psychosocial variables associated with colorectal cancer screening in South Australia.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Ian Zajac; Tess Gregory; Sarah Mehaffey; Naomi Roosa; Deborah Turnbull; Adrian Esterman; Graeme P Young
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2011-12

5.  Population characteristics related to colorectal cancer testing in New South Wales, Australia: results from the 45 and Up Study cohort.

Authors:  Marianne F Weber; Emily Banks; Robyn Ward; Freddy Sitas
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  From the bench to public health: population-level implementation intentions in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Efrat Neter; Nili Stein; Ofra Barnett-Griness; Gad Rennert; Lea Hagoel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Colorectal cancer screening adherence in a general population.

Authors:  Mark W Yeazel; Timothy R Church; Resa M Jones; Laura K Kochevar; Gavin D Watt; Jill E Cordes; Deborah Engelhard; Steven J Mongin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tess A Gregory; Carlene Wilson; Amy Duncan; Deborah Turnbull; Stephen R Cole; Graeme Young
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Improving fecal occult blood testing compliance using a mailed educational reminder.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Veronica Reis; Shanglei Liu; Lorraine Conn; Erik J Groessl; Theodore G Ganiats; Samuel B Ho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of risk.

Authors:  Ryan J Courtney; Christine L Paul; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Finlay A Macrae; Mariko L Carey; John Attia; Mark McEvoy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  4 in total

1.  Influential factors in Black and White breast cancer survivors' beliefs about breast cancer.

Authors:  Megan C Edmonds; Bassam Dahman; Kandace McGuire; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Poor Knowledge of Personal and Familial Colorectal Cancer Risk and Screening Recommendations Associated with Advanced Colorectal Polyps.

Authors:  Swati G Patel; Dennis J Ahnen; Amitha Gumidyala; Jeannine Espinoza; Andrew Nicklawsky; Junxiao Hu; Derek Smith; Jan Lowery; Gregory Austin; Myles Cockburn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Comparative effectiveness of five fecal immunochemical tests using colonoscopy as the gold standard: study protocol.

Authors:  Barcey T Levy; Jeanette M Daly; Yinghui Xu; Seth D Crockett; Richard M Hoffman; Jeffrey D Dawson; Kim Parang; Navkiran K Shokar; Daniel S Reuland; Marc J Zuckerman; Avraham Levin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.261

4.  Patient perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and the role of general practice.

Authors:  Lynsey J Brown; S Leigh Roeger; Richard L Reed
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.497

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.