Literature DB >> 6718327

Predicting colon cancer screening behavior from health beliefs.

F A Macrae, D J Hill, D J St John, A Ambikapathy, J F Garner.   

Abstract

A total of 581 people (33% male, 67% female) attending general practitioners completed a questionnaire mainly on health beliefs and were then offered a fecal occult blood test (Hemoccult II) free of charge. Eighty-six percent accepted the general practitioners' offer and took the Hemoccult kit home. Of these, 51% complied (i.e., returned specimens for laboratory testing). The Health Belief Model was found to account for 12% of the variance in screening behavior. Perceived barriers to taking the test and perceived susceptibility to bowel cancer were the only components contributing significantly in the multiple regression analysis. Health Belief Model components that were predictive of initial acceptance of the test offer differed from components predictive of ultimate compliance. The influence upon compliance of family history of colorectal cancer, history of colonic symptoms, smoking habits, perceived attitudes of spouses, attitude to detection tests, and subjective stress related to the threat of bowel cancer were also investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6718327     DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(84)90044-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  23 in total

1.  Is there a preference for different ways of performing faecal occult blood tests?

Authors:  J D Kettner; C Whatrup; J E Verne; K Young; C B Williams; J M Northover
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Disparities in colorectal cancer screening rates among Asian Americans and non-Latino whites.

Authors:  Sabrina T Wong; Ginny Gildengorin; Tung Nguyen; Jeremiah Mock
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Modeling pathways to affective barriers on colorectal cancer screening among Japanese Americans.

Authors:  Keiko Honda; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-04

5.  Perceived risk for cancer in an urban sexual minority.

Authors:  Jack E Burkhalter; Jennifer L Hay; Elliot Coups; Barbara Warren; Yuelin Li; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-09-25

6.  Predictors of colorectal cancer surveillance among survivors of childhood cancer treated with radiation: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Casey L Daniel; Connie L Kohler; Kayla L Stratton; Kevin C Oeffinger; Wendy M Leisenring; John W Waterbor; Kimberly F Whelan; Gregory T Armstrong; Tara O Henderson; Kevin R Krull; Leslie L Robison; Paul C Nathan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Facilitating factors for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Corey H Brouse; Randi L Wolf; Charles E Basch
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Colorectal screening patterns and perceptions of risk among African-American users of a community health center.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; B K Rimer; P R Lyna; A A Pradhan; M Conaway; C T Woods-Powell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1996-12

9.  Screening for colorectal cancer: reasons for refusal of faecal occult blood testing in a general practice in England.

Authors:  K A Hynam; A R Hart; S P Gay; A Inglis; A C Wicks; J F Mayberry
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among the US urban Japanese population.

Authors:  Keiko Honda
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.