OBJECTIVES: To review studies that used direct observation (i.e., videotaping or audiotaping) methods in palliative/end-of-life care communication research. DESIGN: Descriptive thematic analysis. SETTING: Multinational studies were conducted in both the outpatient and inpatient setting. MEASUREMENTS: Extensive bibliographic searches (January 1, 1998 to July 31, 2009) of English-language literature involving physician-patient (or physician-family) interactions were conducted and augmented by reviews of reference listings. Three investigators independently abstracted key information from each article. RESULTS: Of the 20 retained articles, most enrolled young-old participants (mean age, 60 years) who were white and had a cancer diagnosis. Patient/family participation rates ranged from 68% to 89% demonstrating feasibility of this approach when studying palliative/end-of-life care communication issues. Four common themes were identified: (1) physicians focus on medical/technical and avoid emotional/quality of life issues; (2) sensitive topics are perceived by physicians to take longer to discuss and often do take longer to discuss; (3) physicians dominate discussions; and (4) patient/family satisfaction is associated with supportive physician behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that direct observation methods can be feasibly used when studying physician-patient/physician-family communication in palliative/end-of-life care, but few investigations have utilized this approach. This article highlights areas that need improvement, including physicians' ability to address patient/family emotional issues and provide what patients and families find most satisfying (participation and support). A particular focus on older patients and patients with end-stage or late-stage chronic (noncancer) illness, the adaptation/application of existing communication measurement tools to capture palliative care communication issues, and development of corresponding outcome measures to assess impact is now needed.
OBJECTIVES: To review studies that used direct observation (i.e., videotaping or audiotaping) methods in palliative/end-of-life care communication research. DESIGN: Descriptive thematic analysis. SETTING: Multinational studies were conducted in both the outpatient and inpatient setting. MEASUREMENTS: Extensive bibliographic searches (January 1, 1998 to July 31, 2009) of English-language literature involving physician-patient (or physician-family) interactions were conducted and augmented by reviews of reference listings. Three investigators independently abstracted key information from each article. RESULTS: Of the 20 retained articles, most enrolled young-old participants (mean age, 60 years) who were white and had a cancer diagnosis. Patient/family participation rates ranged from 68% to 89% demonstrating feasibility of this approach when studying palliative/end-of-life care communication issues. Four common themes were identified: (1) physicians focus on medical/technical and avoid emotional/quality of life issues; (2) sensitive topics are perceived by physicians to take longer to discuss and often do take longer to discuss; (3) physicians dominate discussions; and (4) patient/family satisfaction is associated with supportive physician behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that direct observation methods can be feasibly used when studying physician-patient/physician-family communication in palliative/end-of-life care, but few investigations have utilized this approach. This article highlights areas that need improvement, including physicians' ability to address patient/family emotional issues and provide what patients and families find most satisfying (participation and support). A particular focus on older patients and patients with end-stage or late-stage chronic (noncancer) illness, the adaptation/application of existing communication measurement tools to capture palliative care communication issues, and development of corresponding outcome measures to assess impact is now needed.
Authors: Renee D Stapleton; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Christopher H Goss; J Randall Curtis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Anjali H Anselm; Valerie Palda; Cameron B Guest; Richard F McLean; Mary L S Vachon; Merrijoy Kelner; Jenny Lam-McCulloch Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Liesbeth M Timmermans; Richard W M van der Maazen; Christianne M Verhaak; Mariëlle S van Roosmalen; Willem A J van Daal; Floris W Kraaimaat Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2005-04
Authors: J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Sarah E Shannon; Patsy D Treece; Gordon D Rubenfeld Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-01-07 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Byron C Wallace; M Barton Laws; Kevin Small; Ira B Wilson; Thomas A Trikalinos Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Olga Husson; Melissa S Y Thong; Floortje Mols; Tineke J Smilde; Geert-Jan Creemers; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Christopher T Lim; Avia Tadmor; Daisuke Fujisawa; James J MacDonald; Emily R Gallagher; Justin Eusebio; Vicki A Jackson; Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Teresa Hagan; Elyse R Park Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Ardith Doorenbos; Taryn Lindhorst; Helene Starks; Eugene Aisenberg; J Randall Curtis; Ross Hays Journal: J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care Date: 2012
Authors: M Barton Laws; Mary Catherine Beach; Yoojin Lee; William H Rogers; Somnath Saha; P Todd Korthuis; Victoria Sharp; Ira B Wilson Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2013-01
Authors: M Barton Laws; Yoojin Lee; William H Rogers; Mary Catherine Beach; Somnath Saha; P Todd Korthuis; Victoria Sharp; Jonathan Cohn; Richard Moore; Ira B Wilson Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-07
Authors: Sarah Leatherman Allen; Kimberly S Davis; Paul C Rousseau; Patty J Iverson; Patrick D Mauldin; William P Moran Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2015-03