Literature DB >> 16253789

Barriers to communication regarding end-of-life care: perspectives of care providers.

Anjali H Anselm1, Valerie Palda, Cameron B Guest, Richard F McLean, Mary L S Vachon, Merrijoy Kelner, Jenny Lam-McCulloch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Communication regarding end-of-life care is frequently perceived as suboptimal, despite the intent of both health care providers and patients. We interviewed health care providers to determine their perspective regarding these barriers to communication.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven focus groups with a total of 10 attending physicians, 24 residents, and 33 nurses were convened to explore barriers to end-of-life discussions on the Internal Medicine service at a 600-bed tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Canada. An interview schedule was designed to elicit information regarding the process of end-of-life discussions, barriers to these discussions, and possible interventions for limiting such barriers. Transcripts were qualitatively analyzed by 6 raters who independently identified "themes." Themes were refined using the Delphi technique and classified under broader "categories."
RESULTS: Four main categories of barriers emerged, relating to (1) patients, (2) the health care system, (3) health care providers, and (4) the nature of this dialogue. Attending physicians and residents most frequently identified patient-related factors as barriers to discussions, followed by system, dialogue, and provider barriers (43%, 39%, 10%, and 8%, respectively, for attending physicians; 40%, 34%, 13%, and 13%, respectively, for residents). Nurses similarly identified patient-related and system barriers most frequently, but provider barriers were discussed more often than dialogue barriers (46%, 28%, 22%, and 4%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Attending physicians, residents, and nurses perceive the recipients of their care, and the system within which they provide this care, to be the major source of barriers to communication regarding end-of-life care. This finding may impact on the effectiveness of quality-improvement initiatives in end-of-life care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16253789     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  13 in total

1.  Seven Types of Uncertainty When Clinicians Care for Pediatric Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas L Hill; Jennifer K Walter; Julia E Szymczak; Concetta DiDomenico; Shefali Parikh; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 2.  Directly observed patient-physician discussions in palliative and end-of-life care: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Elizabeth Fine; M Carrington Reid; Rouzi Shengelia; Ronald D Adelman
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.

Authors:  Rebecca E Ryan; Michael Connolly; Natalie K Bradford; Simon Henderson; Anthony Herbert; Lina Schonfeld; Jeanine Young; Josephine I Bothroyd; Amanda Henderson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-08

4.  Oncologist Experience Implementing Goals of Care Discussions in Everyday Ambulatory Oncology Practice: Implications for Education.

Authors:  Carole A Robinson; Gillian Fyles; Michael McKenzie
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Oncologists' strategies and barriers to effective communication about the end of life.

Authors:  Leeat Granek; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Richard Tozer; Paolo Mazzotta
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Factors Influencing Communication Between the Patients with Cancer and their Nurses in Oncology Wards.

Authors:  Vahid Zamanzadeh; Maryam Rassouli; Abbas Abbaszadeh; Alireza Nikanfar; Hamid Alavi-Majd; Akram Ghahramanian
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2014-01

7.  Adopting Advance Directives Reinforces Patient Participation in End-of-Life Care Discussion.

Authors:  Ji Hyung Hong; Jung Hye Kwon; Il Kyu Kim; Jin Hee Ko; Yi-Jin Kang; Hoon-Kyo Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Oncology nurses' perceptions of obstacles and role at the end-of-life care: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Aurelija Blaževičienė; Jamesetta A Newland; Vilija Čivinskienė; Renea L Beckstrand
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  Allow natural death versus do-not-resuscitate: titles, information contents, outcomes, and the considerations related to do-not-resuscitate decision.

Authors:  Sheng-Yu Fan; Ying-Wei Wang; I-Mei Lin
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 10.  A conceptual model of barriers and facilitators to primary clinical teams requesting pediatric palliative care consultation based upon a narrative review.

Authors:  Jennifer K Walter; Douglas L Hill; Concetta DiDomenico; Shefali Parikh; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.