PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify inherent tensions that arose during family conferences in the intensive care unit, and the communication strategies clinicians used in response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 51 clinician-family conferences in the intensive care unit from 4 hospitals in which the attending physician believed discussion of withdrawing life-sustaining treatments or delivery of bad news would occur. The communication between clinicians and family members was analyzed using a dialectic perspective. RESULTS: The tension of choosing whether to "let the patient die now" versus to "not let the patient die now" was the central contradiction within the conferences. Under this overriding theme were 5 categories: killing or allowing to die; death as a benefit or a burden; honoring the patient's wishes or following the family's wishes; weighing contradictory versions of the patient's wishes; and choosing an individual family member as decision maker or the family as a unit as decision maker. In response to these contradictions, clinicians used 2 clusters of communication strategies: decision-centered strategies and information-seeking strategies. CONCLUSIONS: This study offered insights into end-of-life decision making, prompting clinicians to be conscious of the contradictions that arise and to use specific strategies to address these contradictions in their communication with families.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify inherent tensions that arose during family conferences in the intensive care unit, and the communication strategies clinicians used in response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 51 clinician-family conferences in the intensive care unit from 4 hospitals in which the attending physician believed discussion of withdrawing life-sustaining treatments or delivery of bad news would occur. The communication between clinicians and family members was analyzed using a dialectic perspective. RESULTS: The tension of choosing whether to "let the patient die now" versus to "not let the patient die now" was the central contradiction within the conferences. Under this overriding theme were 5 categories: killing or allowing to die; death as a benefit or a burden; honoring the patient's wishes or following the family's wishes; weighing contradictory versions of the patient's wishes; and choosing an individual family member as decision maker or the family as a unit as decision maker. In response to these contradictions, clinicians used 2 clusters of communication strategies: decision-centered strategies and information-seeking strategies. CONCLUSIONS: This study offered insights into end-of-life decision making, prompting clinicians to be conscious of the contradictions that arise and to use specific strategies to address these contradictions in their communication with families.
Authors: Jill R Quinn; Madeline Schmitt; Judith Gedney Baggs; Sally A Norton; Mary T Dombeck; Craig R Sellers Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Kathryn I Pollak; Jacqueline Jones; Hillary D Lum; Scott De La Cruz; Susanne Felton; Arvin Gill; Jean S Kutner Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Amber S Spijkers; Aranka Akkermans; Ellen M A Smets; Marcus J Schultz; Thomas G V Cherpanath; Job B M van Woensel; Marc van Heerde; Anton H van Kaam; Moniek van de Loo; Dick L Willems; Mirjam A de Vos Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 41.787