Literature DB >> 16625131

Clinician statements and family satisfaction with family conferences in the intensive care unit.

Renee D Stapleton1, Ruth A Engelberg, Marjorie D Wenrich, Christopher H Goss, J Randall Curtis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The quality of family-clinician communication in the intensive care unit is often inadequate, but little is known about specific clinician communication behaviors that might improve family satisfaction. In this exploratory analysis, we hypothesized that clinicians' communication behaviors providing emotional support to families during intensive care unit conferences would be associated with increased family satisfaction.
DESIGN: We audiotaped 51 intensive care unit family conferences in which withholding or withdrawing life support was discussed or bad news was delivered. Emotional support techniques used by clinicians during each conference were identified and coded using grounded theory.
SETTING: Four Seattle hospitals.
SUBJECTS: Family members of critically ill patients.
INTERVENTIONS: Questionnaires rating satisfaction with communication were completed by 169 family members.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Linear regression with generalized estimating equation methods was used to analyze the association between the frequency of clinicians' emotionally supportive statements and family satisfaction. Increasing frequency of three types of clinicians' statements during family conferences was associated with increased family satisfaction: a) assurances that the patient will not be abandoned before death (p=.015); b) assurances that the patient will be comfortable and will not suffer (p=.029); and c) support for family's decisions about end- of-life care, including support for family's decision to withdraw or not to withdraw life-support (p=.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Most family members participating in this study were quite satisfied with the communication in the family conferences. Specific clinician communication behaviors are associated with increased family satisfaction during family conferences among family members who are willing to have a family conference recorded. Our results suggest that clinicians in the intensive care unit may improve the experiences of families of critically ill patients by providing explicit support for decisions made by a family with regard to end-of-life care and by assuring families continuity of high-quality care with particular attention to the patient's comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16625131     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000218409.58256.AA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  63 in total

1.  Identifying elements of ICU care that families report as important but unsatisfactory: decision-making, control, and ICU atmosphere.

Authors:  Tristan R Osborn; J Randall Curtis; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Anthony L Back; Sarah E Shannon; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Integration of palliative care in chronic critical illness management.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Aluko A Hope
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.258

3.  A randomized trial of two methods to disclose prognosis to surrogate decision makers in intensive care units.

Authors:  Susan J Lee Char; Leah R Evans; Grace L Malvar; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  The decision to engage in end-of-life discussions: a structured approach for doctors in training.

Authors:  Rory Conn; Philip A Berry
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.659

5.  Development and evaluation of an interprofessional communication intervention to improve family outcomes in the ICU.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Paul S Ciechanowski; Lois Downey; Julia Gold; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Sarah E Shannon; Patsy D Treece; Jessica P Young; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  [Decision conflicts with relatives in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  M Ratliff; J-O Neumann
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  The emotive impact of medical language.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Vranceanu; Megan Elbon; Margaritha Adams; David Ring
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-09

8.  Alterations during medical interpretation of ICU family conferences that interfere with or enhance communication.

Authors:  Kiemanh Pham; J Daryl Thornton; Ruth A Engelberg; J Carey Jackson; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  The challenge of selection bias and confounding in palliative care research.

Authors:  Helene Starks; Paula Diehr; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.947

10.  Expectations and outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Christopher E Cox; Tereza Martinu; Shailaja J Sathy; Alison S Clay; Jessica Chia; Alice L Gray; Maren K Olsen; Joseph A Govert; Shannon S Carson; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.