Literature DB >> 20482350

Patient attitudes toward retention and perceptions of treatment success.

Nikolay D Mollov1, Steven J Lindauer, Al M Best, Bhavna Shroff, Eser Tufekci.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To discern patients' opinions regarding responsibility for orthodontic retention and to determine whether patient attitudes toward retention are related to perceptions of treatment success.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires regarding orthodontic retention were distributed to first-year undergraduate college students (n = 158), first-year dental students (n = 183), and retention patients at orthodontic offices (n = 214). Items included treatment satisfaction, perceived responsibility for retention, type of retainer prescribed, reasons for discontinuing use of retainers, and relapse experienced.
RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-eight of 555 participants indicated that they had received orthodontic treatment. Most indicated they were either "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their teeth, both at the end of treatment (96%) and currently (84%). There was a strong relationship between the perception of stability of tooth position and current satisfaction level (P < .0001). Most individuals (88%) indicated that they themselves were responsible for maintaining the alignment and fit of their teeth. Those who indicated that someone else was responsible were nearly twice as likely to be dissatisfied with their teeth (P = .0496). Patients who had been prescribed clear, invisible retainers were significantly more likely to be "very satisfied" currently (50%) compared to those with Hawley (35%) or permanently bonded (36%) retainers (P = .0002). Patients with Hawley retainers were significantly less likely to be wearing them currently as prescribed (45%) than those with invisible (65%) or bonded (68%) retainers (P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with orthodontic results after treatment is related to patient perceptions of responsibility for retention and perceived stability of tooth position. Patients should play a contributory role in formulating orthodontic retention plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20482350      PMCID: PMC8966453          DOI: 10.2319/102109-594.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  28 in total

1.  A comprehensive survey of retention procedures in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Pamela M Wong; Terry J Freer
Journal:  Aust Orthod J       Date:  2004-11

2.  Patients' attitudes towards compliance with retainer wear.

Authors:  Pamela Wong; Terry J Freer
Journal:  Aust Orthod J       Date:  2005-05

3.  The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Heidi Rowland; Lisa Hichens; Alison Williams; Darren Hills; Norman Killingback; Paul Ewings; Steven Clark; Anthony J Ireland; Jonathan R Sandy
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Unexpected complications of bonded mandibular lingual retainers.

Authors:  Christos Katsaros; Christos Livas; Anne-Marie Renkema
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Long-term experience with direct-bonded retainers: update and clinical advice.

Authors:  Björn U Zachrisson
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2007-12

6.  2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends.

Authors:  Robert G Keim; Eugene L Gottlieb; Allen H Nelson; David S Vogels
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2008-11

7.  A survey on orthodontic retention procedures in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Anne Marie Renkema; Elke Tilly Hélène Sips; Ewald Bronkhorst; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The effect of a contingency contracting procedure on patient compliance with removable retention.

Authors:  A M Gross; C L Schwartz; G D Kellum; F W Bishop
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1991-05

9.  Comparison of Essix and Hawley retainers.

Authors:  S J Lindauer; R C Shoff
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1998-02

10.  Meeting the information needs of patients: results from a patient focus group.

Authors:  P C Tang; C Newcomb; S Gorden; N Kreider
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997
View more
  11 in total

1.  Performance of clear vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers depending on retention protocol: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eleftherios G Kaklamanos; Maria Kourakou; Dimitrios Kloukos; Ioannis Doulis; Smaragda Kavvadia
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 2.  Retention in orthodontics.

Authors:  C D Johnston; S J Littlewood
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Resilient Attachments as an Alternative to Conventional Cast Clasp Removable Partial Denture: 3-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Cristian Schuh; Jovito Adiel Skupien; Mauro Elias Mesko; Fernanda Valentini; Tatiana Pereira-Cenci; Noéli Boscato
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-20

Review 4.  Negative online reviews of orthodontists: Content analysis of complaints posted by dissatisfied patients.

Authors:  Adam M Skrypczak; William A Tressel; Sara Ghayour; Roozbeh Khosravi; Douglas S Ramsay
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Upper bonded retainers.

Authors:  Eva Schneider; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Facial divergence and mandibular crowding in treated subjects.

Authors:  Avrum I Goldberg; R G Behrents; Donald R Oliver; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Evaluation of retention protocols among members of the American Association of Orthodontists in the United States.

Authors:  Michael C Pratt; George Thomas Kluemper; James K Hartsfield; David Fardo; David A Nash
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 8.  Development of a clinical practice guideline for orthodontic retention.

Authors:  Cleo Wouters; Toon A Lamberts; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Anne Marie Renkema
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Parental Satisfaction with Their Children's Rapid Palatal Expansion Treatment Provided by Orthodontists and Pediatric Dentists.

Authors:  Saleh H Alwadei; Khalid Almotiry; Amjad AlMawash; Farhan H Alwadei; Abdurahman H Alwadei
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Orthodontic retention and the role of the general dental practitioner.

Authors:  Charlotte Molyneaux; Jonathan R Sandy; Anthony J Ireland
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 1.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.