Literature DB >> 16433081

Patients' attitudes towards compliance with retainer wear.

Pamela Wong1, Terry J Freer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this survey were to determine patients' attitudes towards retainers and their compliance in wearing retainers.
METHODS: Three hundred dental school patients were selected at random and survey questionnaires were distributed. Twelve private orthodontists were willing to participate in the survey and each was given 20 questionnaires for distribution to their patients. The questionnaire was designed to gather information regarding compliance in wearing removable retainers, perception of the comfort level of retainers and acceptance of the appearance of removable and fixed retainers.
RESULTS: The results revealed that compliance in wearing an upper retainer was related to its comfort level and acceptance. Discomfort was the main reason given by dental school patients and forgetfulness was the major reason given by private patients for not wearing retainers. Higher proportions of patients found fixed retainers more comfortable to wear and were more willing to accept the appearance of fixed retainers. A higher proportion of private patients accepted the appearance of retainers compared with dental school patients, while a higher proportion of dental school patients found retainers less comfortable to wear than private patients.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong relationship between compliance and comfort level in wearing upper removable retainers. Patients found fixed retainers more acceptable than removable types because of appearance and comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16433081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Orthod J        ISSN: 0587-3908


  5 in total

1.  Performance of clear vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers depending on retention protocol: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eleftherios G Kaklamanos; Maria Kourakou; Dimitrios Kloukos; Ioannis Doulis; Smaragda Kavvadia
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Patient attitudes toward retention and perceptions of treatment success.

Authors:  Nikolay D Mollov; Steven J Lindauer; Al M Best; Bhavna Shroff; Eser Tufekci
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Evaluation of retention protocols among members of the American Association of Orthodontists in the United States.

Authors:  Michael C Pratt; George Thomas Kluemper; James K Hartsfield; David Fardo; David A Nash
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  A two-year comparative assessment of retention of arch width increases between modified vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a multi-center randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Asma Ashari; Nik Mukhriz Nik Mustapha; Jonathan Jun Xian Yuen; Zhi Kuan Saw; May Nak Lau; Lew Xian; Alizae Marny Fadzlin Syed Mohamed; Rohaya Megat Abdul Wahab; Chiew Kit Yeoh; Malathi Deva Tata; Sindhu Sinnasamy
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.247

5.  Factors affecting orthodontists' management of the retention phase.

Authors:  Kevin Bibona; Bhavna Shroff; Al M Best; Steven J Lindauer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.079

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.