Literature DB >> 19401355

A survey on orthodontic retention procedures in The Netherlands.

Anne Marie Renkema1, Elke Tilly Hélène Sips, Ewald Bronkhorst, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to survey retention procedures used in orthodontic practices in The Netherlands. A questionnaire was sent to all 279 orthodontists working in The Netherlands. The questionnaire consisted of six parts, mainly containing multiple-choice questions. Information as to background data on the individual orthodontist, retention in general, frequency of different types of removable or bonded retainers that were used, retention protocol, and the type and size of the wire used for bonded retainers was assessed. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 12.0.1. Tests for the relationship between two items were based on the chi-square test. The overall response rate was 91 per cent. Most orthodontists placed a bonded retainer in the upper and lower arch, except when the upper arch was expanded during treatment or when extractions were performed in the upper arch, in which case they placed a removable retainer. Opinions varied with regard to how many hours the removable retainers should be worn and the duration of the retention phase. Contraindications for bonded retainers were given by 96 per cent of the orthodontists, with poor oral hygiene being the most commonly mentioned. As far as bonded retainers were concerned, 84 per cent of the orthodontists preferred permanent retention. Fifty-nine per cent of the orthodontists believed that a practice guideline for retention after orthodontic treatment needs to be developed, which was confirmed by the varied responses in this survey.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19401355     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  28 in total

1.  Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Performance of clear vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers depending on retention protocol: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eleftherios G Kaklamanos; Maria Kourakou; Dimitrios Kloukos; Ioannis Doulis; Smaragda Kavvadia
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Factors influencing fixed retention practices in German-speaking Switzerland: A survey.

Authors:  Sina N Arnold; Nikolaos Pandis; Raphael Patcas
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy.

Authors:  M Wolf; P Schumacher; F Jäger; J Wego; U Fritz; H Korbmacher-Steiner; A Jäger; M Schauseil
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Post-treatment changes in permanent retention.

Authors:  Michael Wolf; U Schulte; K Küpper; C Bourauel; L Keilig; S N Papageorgiou; C Dirk; C Kirschneck; N Daratsianos; A Jäger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Patient attitudes toward retention and perceptions of treatment success.

Authors:  Nikolay D Mollov; Steven J Lindauer; Al M Best; Bhavna Shroff; Eser Tufekci
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Upper bonded retainers.

Authors:  Eva Schneider; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Survey on Retention Protocols Among Turkish Orthodontists.

Authors:  Aylin Paşaoğlu; Işıl Aras; Ali Mert; Aynur Aras
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-01

9.  Approaches of Turkish Dentists in Cases of Orthodontic Lingual Retainer Failures.

Authors:  Abdurahman Küçükönder; Ömer Hatipoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-09-28

10.  Factors affecting orthodontists' management of the retention phase.

Authors:  Kevin Bibona; Bhavna Shroff; Al M Best; Steven J Lindauer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.