Adam M Skrypczak1, William A Tressel2, Sara Ghayour3, Roozbeh Khosravi1, Douglas S Ramsay4. 1. Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. 2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. 3. College of Arts and Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. 4. Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash; Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. Electronic address: ramsay@uw.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Patients may express views about their orthodontic care by posting publicly available reviews on the Internet. This study analyzed online reviews of orthodontists with an emphasis on the types and frequency of complaints expressed in negative reviews. METHODS: A random sample of 10.6% of the American Association of Orthodontists membership was evaluated to identify members practicing in a North American office that is limited to orthodontics and has an online presence. Information regarding those orthodontists and their offices was collected. For offices with Google and/or Yelp reviews, all negative (1- or 2-star) reviews were saved for content analysis. If an office posted a response to a negative review, those responses were also collected for analysis. RESULTS: Of the 807 eligible orthodontists, 92.4% had reviews on Google and/or Yelp. Average ratings of orthodontists were very positive (ie, 4- and 5-star reviews constituted >97% of Google reviews and >88% of Yelp reviews), yielding an average orthodontist rating of 4.72 on Google and 4.42 on Yelp. However, approximately half of those orthodontists (50.9%) also had at least 1 negative review. The 3 most frequently mentioned categories of complaints were regarding quality of care and/or service, interpersonal interactions, and money and/or financial issues. An analysis of the specific kinds of complaints is described. Orthodontists posting responses to negative reviews had significantly better average ratings than those who did not, but this association does not demonstrate a causal relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the complaints orthodontic patients express in online reviews may suggest strategies to improve patient satisfaction and an orthodontist's online reputation.
INTRODUCTION:Patients may express views about their orthodontic care by posting publicly available reviews on the Internet. This study analyzed online reviews of orthodontists with an emphasis on the types and frequency of complaints expressed in negative reviews. METHODS: A random sample of 10.6% of the American Association of Orthodontists membership was evaluated to identify members practicing in a North American office that is limited to orthodontics and has an online presence. Information regarding those orthodontists and their offices was collected. For offices with Google and/or Yelp reviews, all negative (1- or 2-star) reviews were saved for content analysis. If an office posted a response to a negative review, those responses were also collected for analysis. RESULTS: Of the 807 eligible orthodontists, 92.4% had reviews on Google and/or Yelp. Average ratings of orthodontists were very positive (ie, 4- and 5-star reviews constituted >97% of Google reviews and >88% of Yelp reviews), yielding an average orthodontist rating of 4.72 on Google and 4.42 on Yelp. However, approximately half of those orthodontists (50.9%) also had at least 1 negative review. The 3 most frequently mentioned categories of complaints were regarding quality of care and/or service, interpersonal interactions, and money and/or financial issues. An analysis of the specific kinds of complaints is described. Orthodontists posting responses to negative reviews had significantly better average ratings than those who did not, but this association does not demonstrate a causal relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the complaints orthodontic patients express in online reviews may suggest strategies to improve patient satisfaction and an orthodontist's online reputation.
Authors: Camila Pachêco-Pereira; José Roberto Pereira; Bruce D Dick; Arnaldo Perez; Carlos Flores-Mir Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Austin S Kilaru; Zachary F Meisel; Breah Paciotti; Yoonhee P Ha; Robert J Smith; Benjamin L Ranard; Raina M Merchant Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 7.035