Literature DB >> 20467321

Use of "phantom electrode" technique to extend the range of pitches available through a cochlear implant.

Aniket A Saoji1, Leonid M Litvak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The range of pitch sensations available in cochlear implants (CIs) is conventionally thought to be limited by the location of the most apical and basal electrodes. However, partial bipolar stimulation, in which current is distributed to two intracochlear electrodes and one extracochlear electrode, can produce "phantom electrode" (PE) pitch percepts that extend beyond the pitch range available with physical electrodes. The goals of this study were (1) to determine the PE configuration that generated the lowest pitch relative to monopolar (MP) stimulation of the most apical electrode and (2) to determine the amount of pitch shift produced by different PE configurations.
DESIGN: Ten Advanced Bionics CI users (9 unilateral and 1 bilateral), implanted with the CII or HiRes 90k implant and the HiFocus 1, HiFocus 1j, or Helix electrode arrays participated in this study. PEs were created by simultaneously stimulating the primary and compensating electrodes in opposite phase. To test different PE configurations, the proportion of current delivered to the compensating electrode (sigma) and the electrode separation between the primary and compensatory electrode (D) were varied. To estimate the relative pitch of PEs, the lowest pitched PEs with primary electrodes 4 and 8 were compared with subsets of MP electrodes (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, respectively).
RESULTS: In all subjects, it was possible to identify sigma and D values that produced a PE that was lower in pitch than the MP stimulation of the primary electrode. In some subjects, increasing sigma and/or D produced progressively lower pitch percepts, whereas in others, PE pitch changed nonmonotonically with sigma and/or D. The amount of PE pitch shift could be estimated only for 14 cases; in seven cases, the pitch shift was <1 MP electrode, and in seven other cases, the pitch shift was between 1 and 2 MP electrodes.
CONCLUSIONS: PE stimulation can elicit pitch percepts lower than that of the most apical MP electrode; the PE pitch is lower by the equivalent of 0.5 to 2 MP electrodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20467321     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e1d15e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  19 in total

1.  Current steering with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-19

2.  Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Arthi G Srinivasan; Monica Padilla; Robert V Shannon; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Electrode spanning with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-28

4.  Improving virtual channel discrimination in a multi-channel context.

Authors:  Arthi G Srinivasan; Robert V Shannon; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Aniket A Saoji; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.

Authors:  Silke Klawitter; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Cochlear Place of Stimulation Is One Determinant of Cochlear Implant Sound Quality.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Sarah Cook Natale; Leslie Baxter; Daniel M Zeitler; Mathew L Carlson; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Place-pitch manipulations with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-30

10.  Combining current focusing and steering in a cochlear implant processing strategy.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Ching-Chih Wu; Kathryn Pulling
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.