Literature DB >> 20463378

Comparison of DVH data from multiple radiotherapy treatment planning systems.

M A Ebert1, A Haworth, R Kearvell, B Hooton, B Hug, N A Spry, S A Bydder, D J Joseph.   

Abstract

This study examined the variation of dose-volume histogram (DVH) data sourced from multiple radiotherapy treatment planning systems (TPSs). Treatment plan exports were obtained from 33 Australian and New Zealand centres during a dosimetry study. Plan information, including DVH data, was exported from the TPS at each centre and reviewed in a digital review system (SWAN). The review system was then used to produce an independent calculation of DVH information for each delineated structure. The relationships between DVHs extracted from each TPS and independently calculated were examined, particularly in terms of the influence of CT scan slice and pixel widths, the resolution of dose calculation grids and the TPS manufacturer. Calculation of total volume and DVH data was consistent between SWAN and each TPS, with the small discrepancies found tending to increase with decreasing structure size. This was significantly influenced by the TPS model used to derive the data. For target structures covered with relatively uniform dose distributions, there was a significant difference between the minimum dose in each TPS-exported DVH and that calculated independently.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20463378     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/11/N04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

1.  The effect of slice thickness on target and organs at risk volumes, dosimetric coverage and radiobiological impact in IMRT planning.

Authors:  S P Srivastava; C-W Cheng; I J Das
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Associated factors of radiation pneumonitis induced by precise radiotherapy in 186 elderly patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Zhen Cui; Ye Tian; Bin He; Hongwei Li; Duojie Li; Jingjing Liu; Hanfei Cai; Jianjun Lou; Hao Jiang; Xueming Shen; Kaigui Peng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Dependence of volume calculation and margin growth accuracy on treatment planning systems for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  David J Eaton; Kevin Alty
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Credentialing of radiotherapy centres in Australasia for TROG 09.02 (Chisel), a Phase III clinical trial on stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy of early stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Tomas Kron; Brent Chesson; Nicholas Hardcastle; Melissa Crain; Natalie Clements; Mark Burns; David Ball
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques.

Authors:  Haisong Liu; Evan M Thomas; Jun Li; Yan Yu; David Andrews; James M Markert; John B Fiveash; Wenyin Shi; Richard A Popple
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-02

6.  Influence of image slice thickness on rectal dose-response relationships following radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Olsson; M Thor; M Liu; V Moissenko; S E Petersen; M Høyer; A Apte; J O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Isobio software: biological dose distribution and biological dose volume histogram from physical dose conversion using linear-quadratic-linear model.

Authors:  Tanwiwat Jaikuna; Phatchareewan Khadsiri; Nisa Chawapun; Suwit Saekho; Ekkasit Tharavichitkul
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-02-20

8.  Dose planning objectives in anal canal cancer IMRT: the TROG ANROTAT experience.

Authors:  Elizabeth Brown; Alison Cray; Annette Haworth; Sarat Chander; Robert Lin; Brindha Subramanian; Michael Ng
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2015-02-12

9.  On the use of a convolution-superposition algorithm for plan checking in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Hardcastle; Bradley M Oborn; Annette Haworth
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Recommended dose voxel size and statistical uncertainty parameters for precision of Monte Carlo dose calculation in stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Simon K Goodall; Martin A Ebert
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.