Literature DB >> 24936956

Influence of image slice thickness on rectal dose-response relationships following radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

C Olsson1, M Thor, M Liu, V Moissenko, S E Petersen, M Høyer, A Apte, J O Deasy.   

Abstract

When pooling retrospective data from different cohorts, slice thicknesses of acquired computed tomography (CT) images used for treatment planning may vary between cohorts. It is, however, not known if varying slice thickness influences derived dose-response relationships. We investigated this for rectal bleeding using dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the rectum and rectal wall for dose distributions superimposed on images with varying CT slice thicknesses. We used dose and endpoint data from two prostate cancer cohorts treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to either 74 Gy (N = 159) or 78 Gy (N = 159) at 2 Gy per fraction. The rectum was defined as the whole organ with content, and the morbidity cut-off was Grade ≥2 late rectal bleeding. Rectal walls were defined as 3 mm inner margins added to the rectum. DVHs for simulated slice thicknesses from 3 to 13 mm were compared to DVHs for the originally acquired slice thicknesses at 3 and 5 mm. Volumes, mean, and maximum doses were assessed from the DVHs, and generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) values were calculated. For each organ and each of the simulated slice thicknesses, we performed predictive modeling of late rectal bleeding using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model. For the most coarse slice thickness, rectal volumes increased (≤18%), whereas maximum and mean doses decreased (≤0.8 and ≤4.2 Gy, respectively). For all a values, the gEUD for the simulated DVHs were ≤1.9 Gy different than the gEUD for the original DVHs. The best-fitting LKB model parameter values with 95% CIs were consistent between all DVHs. In conclusion, we found that the investigated slice thickness variations had minimal impact on rectal dose-response estimations. From the perspective of predictive modeling, our results suggest that variations within 10 mm in slice thickness between cohorts are unlikely to be a limiting factor when pooling multi-institutional rectal dose data that include slice thickness variations within this range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24936956      PMCID: PMC4786025          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/14/3749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  20 in total

1.  CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research.

Authors:  Joseph O Deasy; Angel I Blanco; Vanessa H Clark
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dose uncertainty due to computed tomography (CT) slice thickness in CT-based high dose rate brachytherapy of the prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yongbok Kim; I-Chow Joe Hsu; Etienne Lessard; Jean Pouliot; Jasmina Vujic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method.

Authors:  G J Kutcher; C Burman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms.

Authors:  J T Lyman
Journal:  Radiat Res Suppl       Date:  1985

5.  Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Katrine J Emmertsen; Søren Laurberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Comparison of dose length, area, and volume histograms as quantifiers of urethral dose in prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  W M Butler; G S Merrick; A T Dorsey; B M Hagedorn
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  How thick should CT/MR slices be to plan conformal radiotherapy? A study on the accuracy of three-dimensional volume reconstruction.

Authors:  A Somigliana; G Zonca; G Loi; A E Sichirollo
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

8.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) decreases treatment-related morbidity and potentially enhances tumor control.

Authors:  Bin S Teh; Wei-Yuan Mai; Walter H Grant; J Kam Chiu; Hsin H Lu; L Steven Carpenter; Shiao Y Woo; E Brian Butler
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.176

9.  Fitting late rectal bleeding data using different NTCP models: results from an Italian multi-centric study (AIROPROS0101).

Authors:  T Rancati; C Fiorino; G Gagliardi; G M Cattaneo; G Sanguineti; V Casanova Borca; C Cozzarini; G Fellin; F Foppiano; G Girelli; L Menegotti; A Piazzolla; V Vavassori; R Valdagni
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Dosimetric uncertainties of three-dimensional dose reconstruction from two-dimensional data in a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Rebecca Weinberg; Darryl G L Kaurin; Hak Choy; Walter J Curran; Robert MacRae; Jae Sung Kim; Jaechul Kim; Susan L Tucker; Philip D Bonomi; Chandra Belani; George Starkschall
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

1.  A simple method of evaluating margin-growing accuracy in image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Fu Jin; Juan Zhou; Huanli Luo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Impact of CT slice thickness on volume and dose evaluation during thoracic cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Huanli Luo; Yanan He; Fu Jin; Dingyi Yang; Xianfeng Liu; Xueqi Ran; Ying Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.989

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.