Literature DB >> 20463200

Generalization of dynamics learning across changes in movement amplitude.

Andrew A G Mattar1, David J Ostry.   

Abstract

Studies on generalization show the nature of how learning is encoded in the brain. Previous studies have shown rather limited generalization of dynamics learning across changes in movement direction, a finding that is consistent with the idea that learning is primarily local. In contrast, studies show a broader pattern of generalization across changes in movement amplitude, suggesting a more general form of learning. To understand this difference, we performed an experiment in which subjects held a robotic manipulandum and made movements to targets along the body midline. Subjects were trained in a velocity-dependent force field while moving to a 15 cm target. After training, subjects were tested for generalization using movements to a 30 cm target. We used force channels in conjunction with movements to the 30 cm target to assess the extent of generalization. Force channels restricted lateral movements and allowed us to measure force production during generalization. We compared actual lateral forces to the forces expected if dynamics learning generalized fully. We found that, during the test for generalization, subjects produced reliably less force than expected. Force production was appropriate for the portion of the transfer movement in which velocities corresponded to those experienced with the 15 cm target. Subjects failed to produce the expected forces when velocities exceeded those experienced in the training task. This suggests that dynamics learning generalizes little beyond the range of one's experience. Consistent with this result, subjects who trained on the 30 cm target showed full generalization to the 15 cm target. We performed two additional experiments that show that interleaved trials to the 30 cm target during training on the 15 cm target can resolve the difference between the current results and those reported previously.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20463200      PMCID: PMC2904213          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00886.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  26 in total

1.  Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; Z M Pine; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements.

Authors:  R A Scheidt; D J Reinkensmeyer; M A Conditt; W Z Rymer; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment.

Authors:  C D Takahashi; R A Scheidt; D J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Transfer of motor learning across arm configurations.

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand.

Authors:  Rieko Osu; Satomi Hirai; Toshinori Yoshioka; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-01-25       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiments in human motor control.

Authors:  Opher Donchin; Joseph T Francis; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Visual cues signaling object grasp reduce interference in motor learning.

Authors:  Nicholas Cothros; Jeremy Wong; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Generalization of object manipulation skills learned without limb motion.

Authors:  Christopher D Mah; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Context-dependent anticipation of different task dynamics: rapid recall of appropriate motor skills using visual cues.

Authors:  Nedialko I Krouchev; John F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  30 in total

1.  Nonhomogeneous transfer reveals specificity in speech motor learning.

Authors:  Amélie Rochet-Capellan; Lara Richer; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Linear hypergeneralization of learned dynamics across movement speeds reveals anisotropic, gain-encoding primitives for motor adaptation.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Obafunso Ajayi; Gary C Sing; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Generalization and transfer of contextual cues in motor learning.

Authors:  A M E Sarwary; D F Stegeman; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Generalization of reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration at different distances in the workspace.

Authors:  Ahmed A Mostafa; Rozbeh Kamran-Disfani; Golsa Bahari-Kashani; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Asymmetric generalization in adaptation to target displacement errors in humans and in a neural network model.

Authors:  Stephanie Westendorff; Shenbing Kuang; Bahareh Taghizadeh; Opher Donchin; Alexander Gail
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Performing a reaching task with one arm while adapting to a visuomotor rotation with the other can lead to complete transfer of motor learning across the arms.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Yuming Lei; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Challenging balance during sensorimotor adaptation increases generalization.

Authors:  Amanda Bakkum; J Maxwell Donelan; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Using dual tasks to test immediate transfer of training between naturalistic movements: a proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 1.328

10.  Motor learning and its sensory effects: time course of perceptual change and its presence with gradual introduction of load.

Authors:  Andrew A G Mattar; Mohammad Darainy; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.