Literature DB >> 20457375

Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus.

David P Piñero1, Jorge L Alió, Alicia Alesón, Munir Escaf Vergara, Mauricio Miranda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and clinical keratoconus.
SETTING: Vissum Corporation, Alicante, Spain.
METHODS: Eyes were placed into 1 of 4 groups as follows: keratoconus 2 (grade II), keratoconus 1 (grade I), subclinical (subclinical keratoconus), and control (normal eyes). All eyes had an ophthalmologic examination including corneal evaluation (curvature, elevation, asphericity, pachymetry, corneal volume) by rotating Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam). The posterior-anterior corneal power ratio was also calculated.
RESULTS: Seventy-one eyes (51 patients; aged 16 to 64 years) were evaluated. Astigmatism and keratometry of both corneal surfaces were statistically significantly higher in the keratoconus 1 and 2 groups (P<or=.02). Posterior astigmatism was statistically significantly higher in the subclinical group than in the control group (P = .01). A strong correlation (r>or=-0.81) was found between anterior and posterior curvature in the normal and subclinical groups; the correlation was weaker in clinical keratoconus cases (r<or=-0.56). The correlation in astigmatism between the anterior and posterior surface was good in all keratoconus groups (r>or=0.81). The posterior-anterior corneal power ratio was significantly higher in the keratoconus 2 group than in the other groups (P<or=.01). Pachymetric readings were progressively lower in eyes with subclinical, early, or moderate keratoconus (P<.01). The corneal volume was statistically significantly lower in the keratoconus 2 group than in the other groups (P = .04).
CONCLUSION: The correlation between anterior and posterior corneal curvature was lower in keratoconus, although the correlation between anterior and posterior astigmatism was maintained. (c) 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457375     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  49 in total

1.  Clinical utility of ocular residual astigmatism and topographic disparity vector indexes in subclinical and clinical keratoconus.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí; Roberto Soto-Negro; Pedro Ruiz-Fortes; Alberto Artola
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Correlation of basic indicators with stages of keratoconus assessed by Pentacam tomography.

Authors:  Xian-Li Du; Min Chen; Li-Xin Xie
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Difference in normal corneal thickness and curvature between Mongolian and Han nationalities.

Authors:  Hai-Xia Zhao; Li Zhang; Wen-Ying Guan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Validation of Fourier analysis of videokeratographic data.

Authors:  Haris Sideroudi; Georgios Labiris; Fienke Ditzel; Efi Tsaragli; Kimonas Georgatzoglou; Haralampos Siganos; Vassilios Kozobolis
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Corneal thickness and volume in subclinical and clinical keratoconus.

Authors:  Seyed Mahdi Ahmadi Hosseini; Norhani Mohidin; Fereshteh Abolbashari; Bariah Mohd-Ali; Chandramalar T Santhirathelagan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Comparative analysis of the relationship between anterior and posterior corneal shape analyzed by Scheimpflug photography in normal and keratoconus eyes.

Authors:  Raúl Montalbán; Jorge L Alio; Jaime Javaloy; David P Piñero
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Enhanced Combined Tomography and Biomechanics Data for Distinguishing Forme Fruste Keratoconus.

Authors:  Allan Luz; Bernardo Lopes; Katie M Hallahan; Bruno Valbon; Isaac Ramos; Fernando Faria-Correia; Paulo Schor; William J Dupps; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Epithelial remodeling as basis for machine-based identification of keratoconus.

Authors:  Ronald H Silverman; Raksha Urs; Arindam Roychoudhury; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe; Dan Z Reinstein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Evaluation of anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer in keratoconus patients implanted with intrastromal corneal ring segments.

Authors:  Leonardo Torquetti; Carlos Arce; Jesús Merayo-Lloves; Guilherme Ferrara; Paulo Ferrara; Brenno Signorelli; Armando Signorelli
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Patient-specific computational modeling of keratoconus progression and differential responses to collagen cross-linking.

Authors:  Abhijit Sinha Roy; William J Dupps
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.