Literature DB >> 20455060

Reliability of radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion.

Thomas Kappe1, Tugrul Kocak, Carl Neuerburg, Sabine Lippacher, Ralf Bieger, Heiko Reichel.   

Abstract

Acetabular retroversion may contribute to femoroacetabular impingement and lead to osteoarthritis of the hip. Retroversion has been measured on computed tomography scans. In recent years, assessment of acetabular version on anteroposterior pelvic views has gained increasing attention. We therefore aimed to determine the reliability of radiographic signs of acetabular retroversion and its association with the rater's experience. Five orthopedic surgeons (o1 to o5) rated the crossover sign, ischial spine sign and posterior wall sign on X-rays of 40 hip joints. Also, we determined the rater's experience in recognizing acetabular retroversion with a questionnaire and correlated intraobserver reliability to the calculated experience score. The intraobserver results were 0.325 (o1), 0.848 (o2), 0.684 (o3), 0.701 (o4), and 1.000 (o5) for the crossover sign, 0.750 (o1), 0.890 (o2), 0.593 (o3), 0.483 (o4), and 0.946 (o5) for the posterior wall sign; and 0.578 (o1), 0.680 (o2), 0.595 (o3), 0.375 (o4), and 0.800 (o5) for the ischial spine sign. Interobserver reliability was 0.514 for the crossover, 0.633 for the posterior, and 0.543 for the ischial spine sign wall. The experience sum score correlated to the kappa results for the crossover (r = 0.527), posterior wall (r = 0.738), and ischial spine sign (r = 0.949). Assessing acetabular version on plain radiographs is subject to intra- and interindividual error and related to the observer's individual experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20455060      PMCID: PMC3103958          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1035-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

1.  Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; R Schoeniger; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; D F Kalbermatten; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Three-dimensional CT analysis to determine acetabular retroversion and the implications for the management of femoro-acetabular impingement.

Authors:  W Dandachli; S Ul Islam; M Liu; R Richards; M Hall-Craggs; J Witt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

4.  The ischial spine sign: does pelvic tilt and rotation matter?

Authors:  Diganta K Kakaty; Andreas F Fischer; Harish S Hosalkar; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Retroversion of the acetabular dome after Salter and triple pelvic osteotomy for congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  Claudio Dora; Eric Mascard; Kiril Mladenov; Raphael Seringe
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Acetabular morphology: implications for joint-preserving surgery.

Authors:  Werner Köhnlein; Reinhold Ganz; Franco M Impellizzeri; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Prevalence of acetabular dome retroversion in a mixed race adult trauma patient population.

Authors:  Clément M L Werner; Carol E Copeland; Thomas Ruckstuhl; Jeff Stromberg; Burkhard Seifert; Clifford H Turen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.500

8.  Acetabular retroversion in military recruits with femoral neck stress fractures.

Authors:  Kevin M Kuhn; Anthony I Riccio; Nelson S Saldua; Jeffrey Cassidy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Morphologic features of congenital acetabular dysplasia: one in six is retroverted.

Authors:  Patrick L S Li; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Nicholas J Giori; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  12 in total

1.  Femoroacetabular impingement: a consideration in younger adults with hip pain.

Authors:  Heather Hansen; Regina Taylor-Gjevre; Haron Obaid; Rajiv Gandhi; Anthony King
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Femoro-acetabular impingement: what the general radiologist should know.

Authors:  Alberto Aliprandi; Francesco Di Pietto; Paolo Minafra; Marcello Zappia; Simona Pozza; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Can the crossover sign be a reliable marker of global retroversion of the acetabulum?

Authors:  Seyed Ali Hashemi; Javad Dehghani; Amir Reza Vosoughi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  No difference in prevalence of radiographic subspinal impingement of the hip between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Jun-Il Yoo; Yong-Chan Ha; Han-Jun Lee; Jung-Yeop Lee; Young-Kyun Lee; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Segmental acetabular rim defects, bone loss, oversizing, and press fit cup in total hip arthroplasty evaluated with a probabilistic finite element analysis.

Authors:  Farid Amirouche; Giovanni F Solitro; Amit Walia; Mark Gonzalez; Aimee Bobko
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Acetabular retroversion does not affect outcome in primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Christian Dippmann; Volkert Siersma; Søren Overgaard; Michael Rindom Krogsgaard
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.114

7.  Relationship between crossover sign and anterior center-edge angle.

Authors:  Robert A Christian; Michael H McCarthy; Bennet A Butler; Ekamjeet S Dhillon; Michael A Terry; Vehniah K Tjong
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-04-08

8.  Diagnostic Value of Ischial Spine Sign in Patients with Acetabular Retroversion.

Authors:  Mohamad Qoreishy; Hamid R S Hosseinzadeh; Ali Keipourfard; Arya Shoghli
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-03

9.  The acetabulum in Perthes' disease: inter-observer agreement and reliability of radiographic measurements.

Authors:  Stefan Huhnstock; Svein Svenningsen; Are H Pripp; Terje Terjesen; Ola Wiig
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  Radiographic Diagnosis of Pincer-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chanseok Rhee; Tina Le Francois; J W Thomas Byrd; Mark Glazebrook; Ivan Wong
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.