Literature DB >> 19662463

The ischial spine sign: does pelvic tilt and rotation matter?

Diganta K Kakaty1, Andreas F Fischer, Harish S Hosalkar, Klaus A Siebenrock, Moritz Tannast.   

Abstract

Although the ischial spine sign (ISS) has been advocated to detect acetabular retroversion, it is unknown whether the sign is valid on anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs with tilted or rotated pelves. We therefore evaluated reliability of the ISS as a tool for diagnosing acetabular retroversion in the presence of considerable pelvic tilt and/or malrotation. We obtained radiographs of 20 cadaver pelves in 19 different malorientations resulting in 380 pelvis images (760 hips) for evaluation. In addition, 129 clinical radiographs of patients' hips that had varying pelvis orientations were reviewed. We found an overall sensitivity of 81% (90%), specificity of 70% (71%), positive predictive value of 77% (80.7%), and negative predictive value of 75% (85%) in the cadaver (patient) hips. Our data suggest the ISS is a valid tool for diagnosing acetabular retroversion on plain radiographs taken using a standardized technique regardless of the degree of pelvic tilt and rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19662463      PMCID: PMC2816767          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1021-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of acetabular anteversion following total hip arthroplasty: necessity of proper centring.

Authors:  T G Goergen; D Resnick
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; D F Kalbermatten; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  M Tannast; G Zheng; C Anderegg; K Burckhardt; F Langlotz; R Ganz; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the "cross-over-sign".

Authors:  Amir A Jamali; Kiril Mladenov; Dominik C Meyer; Alberto Martinez; Martin Beck; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Ischial spine projection into the pelvis : a new sign for acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Fabian Kalberer; Rafael J Sierra; Sanjeev S Madan; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Robert Trousdale; Young-Jo Kim; Paul E Beaule; Patrick Morgan; Karen Steger-May; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement with Hip2Norm-reliable and validated.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Sapan Mistry; Simon D Steppacher; Stephan Reichenbach; Frank Langlotz; Klaus A Siebenrock; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 9.  Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Reinhold Ganz; Javad Parvizi; Martin Beck; Michael Leunig; Hubert Nötzli; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Nicholas J Giori; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  14 in total

1.  Reliability of radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Thomas Kappe; Tugrul Kocak; Carl Neuerburg; Sabine Lippacher; Ralf Bieger; Heiko Reichel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Supine and Standing AP Pelvis Radiographs in the Evaluation of Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Timothy J Jackson; Allyson A Estess; Gregory J Adamson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Functional acetabular orientation varies between supine and standing radiographs: implications for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  James R Ross; Eric P Tannenbaum; Jeffrey J Nepple; Bryan T Kelly; Christopher M Larson; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Do fluoroscopy and postoperative radiographs correlate for periacetabular osteotomy corrections?

Authors:  Charles L Lehmann; Jeffrey J Nepple; Geneva Baca; Perry L Schoenecker; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The crossover sign overestimates acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Ira Zaltz; Bryan T Kelly; Iftach Hetsroni; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Periacetabular Osteotomy Provides Higher Survivorship Than Rim Trimming for Acetabular Retroversion.

Authors:  Corinne A Zurmühle; Helen Anwander; Christoph E Albers; Markus S Hanke; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Acetabular retroversion in post slipped capital femoral epiphysis deformity.

Authors:  Jeremy P Bauer; Dennis R Roy; Susan Sienko Thomas
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Which radiographic hip parameters do not have to be corrected for pelvic rotation and tilt?

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Stefan Fritsch; Guoyan Zheng; Klaus A Siebenrock; Simon D Steppacher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Femoroacetabular impingement predisposes to traumatic posterior hip dislocation.

Authors:  Simon D Steppacher; Christoph E Albers; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Pelvic morphology differs in rotation and obliquity between developmental dysplasia of the hip and retroversion.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Peter Pfannebecker; Joseph M Schwab; Christoph E Albers; Klaus A Siebenrock; Lorenz Büchler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.