Christian Dippmann1, Volkert Siersma2, Søren Overgaard3, Michael Rindom Krogsgaard4. 1. Section for Sports Traumatology M51, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital. A Part of IOC Research Center Copenhagen, 2400, Copenhagen, Denmark. cdip0006@regionh.dk. 2. The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg, Denmark. 4. Section for Sports Traumatology M51, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital. A Part of IOC Research Center Copenhagen, 2400, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The surgical treatment of femoral-acetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with acetabular retroversion (AR) is arthroscopical or by a reverse periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the results after arthroscopic treatment of FAIS in patients with and without radiographic signs of AR in a large, prospective cohort from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR). The hypothesis was there is no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups. METHODS: Data on 4914 hip arthroscopies performed during 2012-2019 were obtained from DHAR. Patients with radiographic signs of osteoarthritis (Tönnis > 1), hip dysplasia (CEA < 25°), other hip pathologies or previous hip surgery were excluded. The clinical outcomes for patients with AR [defined by a positive posterior wall sign (PWS) in combination with a positive Ischial Spine Sign (ISS)] and patients without AR (no PWS, no ISS) were analyzed 1 and 2 years after surgery. The primary outcomes were the six domains of the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome score (HAGOS), while secondary outcomes were the Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), a visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and a numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain. RESULTS: A total of 3135 hip arthroscopies were included, of which 339 had AR, 1876 did not, and 920 presented one of the two signs (PWS and ISS). There were no statistically significant differences 1 and 2 years after surgery (n.s.) between patients with and without AR in HAGOS domain scores, HSAS, VAS, or NRS. Both groups showed improvement at both follow-ups. The two groups did not differ in relation to intraoperative findings and the procedures they have had. CONCLUSION: The outcome 1 and 2 years after arthroscopic treatment of FAIS is not different for patients with and without AR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: The surgical treatment of femoral-acetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with acetabular retroversion (AR) is arthroscopical or by a reverse periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the results after arthroscopic treatment of FAIS in patients with and without radiographic signs of AR in a large, prospective cohort from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR). The hypothesis was there is no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups. METHODS: Data on 4914 hip arthroscopies performed during 2012-2019 were obtained from DHAR. Patients with radiographic signs of osteoarthritis (Tönnis > 1), hip dysplasia (CEA < 25°), other hip pathologies or previous hip surgery were excluded. The clinical outcomes for patients with AR [defined by a positive posterior wall sign (PWS) in combination with a positive Ischial Spine Sign (ISS)] and patients without AR (no PWS, no ISS) were analyzed 1 and 2 years after surgery. The primary outcomes were the six domains of the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome score (HAGOS), while secondary outcomes were the Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), a visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and a numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain. RESULTS: A total of 3135 hip arthroscopies were included, of which 339 had AR, 1876 did not, and 920 presented one of the two signs (PWS and ISS). There were no statistically significant differences 1 and 2 years after surgery (n.s.) between patients with and without AR in HAGOS domain scores, HSAS, VAS, or NRS. Both groups showed improvement at both follow-ups. The two groups did not differ in relation to intraoperative findings and the procedures they have had. CONCLUSION: The outcome 1 and 2 years after arthroscopic treatment of FAIS is not different for patients with and without AR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Ariel D Davila-Parrilla; James Wylie; Courtney O'Donnell; Daniel A Maranho; Patrick Carry; Eduardo N Novais Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 1.390
Authors: Christian Dippmann; Peter Albrecht-Olsen; Mikael Boesen; Henrik Chrintz; Per Hölmich; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Uffe Jørgensen; Lars Konradsen; Otto Kraemer; Bent Lund; Niels Maagaard; Bjarne Mygind-Klavsen; Søren Overgaard; Ole Ovesen; Jens Stürup; Kjeld Søballe; Torsten Warming; Nikolaj Winther; Michael Krogsgaard Journal: Ugeskr Laeger Date: 2020-01-06
Authors: Sivashankar Chandrasekaran; Nader Darwish; Mary R Close; Carlos Suarez-Ahedo; Parth Lodhia; Benjamin G Domb Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: D R Griffin; E J Dickenson; J O'Donnell; R Agricola; T Awan; M Beck; J C Clohisy; H P Dijkstra; E Falvey; M Gimpel; R S Hinman; P Hölmich; A Kassarjian; H D Martin; R Martin; R C Mather; M J Philippon; M P Reiman; A Takla; K Thorborg; S Walker; A Weir; K L Bennell Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Neil L Duplantier; Patrick C McCulloch; Shane J Nho; Richard C Mather; Brian D Lewis; Joshua D Harris Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2016-04-16 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Niels H Bech; Inger N Sierevelt; Sheryl de Waard; Boudijn S H Joling; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Daniel Haverkamp Journal: Hip Int Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 2.135