Literature DB >> 19205323

Prevalence of acetabular dome retroversion in a mixed race adult trauma patient population.

Clément M L Werner1, Carol E Copeland, Thomas Ruckstuhl, Jeff Stromberg, Burkhard Seifert, Clifford H Turen.   

Abstract

The goals of the present investigation were to identify the prevalence of acetabular dome retroversion in a mixed race population, to quantify the average amount of cross-over ratio, and to determine normative values. The presence of the cross-over sign and its overlap ratio was assessed for 2,925 hips meeting strict radiographic criteria of the pelvic radiograph. Fifty-two percent of the hips had no cross-over sign whereas 48% had at least a minimal amount of overlap of the anterior and posterior acetabular wall. Analysis of only those hips with positive cross-over sign revealed a mean cross-over ratio of 26% +/- 11% (range: 3 to 93). Forty-two percent of the patients had no cross-over on either side, 18% on one side, and 40% on both sides. The presence of the cross-over sign is more common than previously expected. Further studies will be necessary to determine the risk of pathological abnormality and to correlate symptoms to crossover ratios. Surgery should not be based solely on the finding of a cross-over sign without clinical correlation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19205323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  9 in total

1.  Reliability of radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Thomas Kappe; Tugrul Kocak; Carl Neuerburg; Sabine Lippacher; Ralf Bieger; Heiko Reichel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Correlation of the cross-over ratio of the cross-over sign on conventional pelvic radiographs with computed tomography retroversion measurements.

Authors:  Clément M L Werner; Carol E Copeland; Jeff Stromberg; Thomas Ruckstuhl
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Can the crossover sign be a reliable marker of global retroversion of the acetabulum?

Authors:  Seyed Ali Hashemi; Javad Dehghani; Amir Reza Vosoughi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Acetabular retroversion in post slipped capital femoral epiphysis deformity.

Authors:  Jeremy P Bauer; Dennis R Roy; Susan Sienko Thomas
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  An algorithmic approach to surgical decision making in acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Lucas A Anderson; Jill A Erickson; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Acetabular fracture types vary with different acetabular version.

Authors:  Clément M L Werner; Carol E Copeland; Thomas Ruckstuhl; Jeff Stromberg; Clifford H Turen; Samy Bouaicha
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Diagnostic Value of Ischial Spine Sign in Patients with Acetabular Retroversion.

Authors:  Mohamad Qoreishy; Hamid R S Hosseinzadeh; Ali Keipourfard; Arya Shoghli
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-03

8.  Correlation between radiographic measures of acetabular morphology with 3D femoral head coverage in patients with acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Benjamin J Hansen; Michael D Harris; Lucas A Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Radiographic markers of femoroacetabular impingement: correlation of herniation pit and femoral bump with a positive cross-over ratio.

Authors:  Max J Scheyerer; Carol E Copeland; Jeffrey Stromberg; Thomas Ruckstuhl; Clément M L Werner
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2014-04-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.