Literature DB >> 12567152

Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers.

K A Siebenrock1, D F Kalbermatten, R Ganz.   

Abstract

Pelvic inclination is difficult to control on a standard radiograph of the pelvis and has a direct influence on the appearance of acetabular version. By defining the normal range of the distance between the symphysis and the sacrococcygeal joint on 86 standard anteroposterior radiographs of pelves a technique was developed to evaluate pelvic inclination. A statistically significant correlation between this distance and pelvic inclination was shown in four cadaver pelves. Acetabular retroversion signs (cross-over, posterior wall signs) were evaluated on normal pelves from cadavers (two females, two males) after mounting on a holding device and wire marking of the acetabular rims. Radiographs were taken 3 degrees stepwise through the range of 9 degrees inclination to 12 degrees reclination. At the neutral position, two acetabula appeared with both positive retroversion signs compared with none at 6 degrees reclination. At 9 degrees pelvic inclination all acetabula had both signs. Retroversion signs were significantly more pronounced and found at lower pelvic tilt angles in the pelves from males than from females. Evaluation of pelvic inclination will help to decrease measurement errors in assessment of acetabular orientation and femoral head coverage. This will be valuable in preoperative planning of reorientation procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12567152     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200302000-00033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  191 in total

1.  Does Salter innominate osteotomy predispose the patient to acetabular retroversion in adulthood?

Authors:  Daisuke Kobayashi; Shinichi Satsuma; Maki Kinugasa; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Ischial spine sign reveals acetabular retroversion in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.

Authors:  A Noelle Larson; Anthony A Stans; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Report of breakout session: Defining parameters for correcting the acetabulum during a pelvic reorientation osteotomy.

Authors:  Michael B Millis; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a narrative review for the chiropractor.

Authors:  Peter Emary
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2010-09

5.  Reliability of radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Thomas Kappe; Tugrul Kocak; Carl Neuerburg; Sabine Lippacher; Ralf Bieger; Heiko Reichel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  The diagnosis and management of femoro-acetabular impingement.

Authors:  Robert J Macfarlane; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Analysis of acetabular version in the native hip: comparison between 2D axial CT and 3D CT measurements.

Authors:  Wael Dandachli; Saif Ul Islam; Richard Tippett; Margaret A Hall-Craggs; Johan D Witt
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  CT reveals a high incidence of osseous abnormalities in hips with labral tears.

Authors:  Mark M Dolan; Benton E Heyworth; Asheesh Bedi; Gavin Duke; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.

Authors:  Benjamin G Domb; Youssef F El Bitar; Adam Y Sadik; Christine E Stake; Itamar B Botser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  [Joint preserving surgery of the adult hip: pelvic osteotomies].

Authors:  L Büchler; M Beck; H Gollwitzer; B D Katthagen; A R Zahedi
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.