Literature DB >> 22800583

Markedly enhanced skeletal muscle transfection achieved by the ultrasound-targeted delivery of non-viral gene nanocarriers with microbubbles.

Caitlin W Burke1, Jung Soo Suk, Anthony J Kim, Yu-Han J Hsiang, Alexander L Klibanov, Justin Hanes, Richard J Price.   

Abstract

Our goal was to enhance ultrasound (US)-targeted skeletal muscle transfection through the use of poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEG)/polyethylenimine (PEI) nanocomplex gene carriers and adjustments to US and microbubble (MB) parameters. C57BL/6 mice received an intravenous infusion of MBs and either "naked" luciferase plasmid or luciferase plasmid condensed in PEG/PEI nanocomplexes. Pulsed ultrasound (1 MHz; 0.6 MPa or 0.8 MPa) was applied to the right hindlimb for 12 min. Luciferase activity in both hindlimbs was assessed at 3, 5, 7, and 10 days post-treatment by bioluminescent imaging. When targeted to hindlimb using unsorted MBs and 0.6 MPa US, 7 days after treatment, we observed a >60-fold increase in luciferase activity in PEG/PEI nanocomplex-treated muscles over muscles treated with "naked" plasmid DNA. Luciferase activity was consistently greater after treatment with PEG/PEI nanocomplexes at 0.6 MPa as compared to 0.8 MPa. The combination of small diameter MBs and 0.6 MPa US also resulted in significantly greater gene expression when compared to concentration matched intramuscular injections, a control condition in which considerably more PEG/PEI nanocomplexes were present in tissue. This result suggests that, in addition to facilitating PEG/PEI nanocomplex delivery from the bloodstream to tissue, US enhances transfection via one or more secondary mechanisms, including increased cellular uptake and/or trafficking to the nucleus of PEG/PEI nanocomplexes. We conclude that PEG/PEI nanocomplexes may be used to markedly enhance the amplitude of US-MB-targeted skeletal muscle transfection and that activating "small" MBs with a moderate level (0.6 MPa) of acoustic pressure can further enhance these effects.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22800583      PMCID: PMC3438364          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  45 in total

1.  Sonoporation, drug delivery, and gene therapy.

Authors:  H-D Liang; J Tang; M Halliwell
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Ultrasound exposure of lipoplex loaded microbubbles facilitates direct cytoplasmic entry of the lipoplexes.

Authors:  Ine Lentacker; Nan Wang; Roosmarijn E Vandenbroucke; Jo Demeester; Stefaan C De Smedt; Niek N Sanders
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Focused in vivo delivery of plasmid DNA to the porcine vascular wall via intravascular ultrasound destruction of microbubbles.

Authors:  Linsey C Phillips; Alexander L Klibanov; Douglas K Bowles; Michael Ragosta; John A Hossack; Brian R Wamhoff
Journal:  J Vasc Res       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 1.934

4.  Comparison of gene delivery techniques for therapeutic angiogenesis ultrasound-mediated destruction of carrier microbubbles versus direct intramuscular injection.

Authors:  Jeremy Kobulnik; Michael A Kuliszewski; Duncan J Stewart; Jonathan R Lindner; Howard Leong-Poi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Microbubble-size dependence of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in mice in vivo.

Authors:  James J Choi; Jameel A Feshitan; Babak Baseri; Shougang Wang; Yao-Sheng Tung; Mark A Borden; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Effect of microbubble size on fundamental mode high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice.

Authors:  Shashank Sirsi; Jameel Feshitan; James Kwan; Shunichi Homma; Mark Borden
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  The correlation between acoustic cavitation and sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI) in vitro.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Qiu; Yi Luo; Yanli Zhang; Weicheng Cui; Dong Zhang; Junru Wu; Junfeng Zhang; Juan Tu
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Ultrasound-targeted gene delivery induces angiogenesis after a myocardial infarction in mice.

Authors:  Hiroko Fujii; Zhuo Sun; Shu-Hong Li; Jun Wu; Shafie Fazel; Richard D Weisel; Harry Rakowski; Jonathan Lindner; Ren-Ke Li
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

9.  Examination of inertial cavitation of Optison in producing sonoporation of chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  Monica M Forbes; Ryan L Steinberg; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Ultrasound and microbubble-targeted delivery of macromolecules is regulated by induction of endocytosis and pore formation.

Authors:  Bernadet D M Meijering; Lynda J M Juffermans; Annemieke van Wamel; Rob H Henning; Inge S Zuhorn; Marcia Emmer; Amanda M G Versteilen; Walter J Paulus; Wiek H van Gilst; Klazina Kooiman; Nico de Jong; René J P Musters; Leo E Deelman; Otto Kamp
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 17.367

View more
  18 in total

1.  Spatial Control of Gene Expression by Nanocarriers Using Heparin Masking and Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Destruction.

Authors:  Beata Chertok; Robert Langer; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 2.  Nucleic acid delivery with microbubbles and ultrasound.

Authors:  Joshua J Rychak; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Multiparameter evaluation of in vivo gene delivery using ultrasound-guided, microbubble-enhanced sonoporation.

Authors:  Galina Shapiro; Andrew W Wong; Maxim Bez; Fang Yang; Sarah Tam; Lisa Even; Dmitriy Sheyn; Shiran Ben-David; Wafa Tawackoli; Gadi Pelled; Katherine W Ferrara; Dan Gazit
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Localized in vivo model drug delivery with intravascular ultrasound and microbubbles.

Authors:  Joseph P Kilroy; Alexander L Klibanov; Brian R Wamhoff; Douglas K Bowles; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Novel Focused Ultrasound Gene Therapy Approach Noninvasively Restores Dopaminergic Neuron Function in a Rat Parkinson's Disease Model.

Authors:  Brian P Mead; Namho Kim; G Wilson Miller; David Hodges; Panagiotis Mastorakos; Alexander L Klibanov; James W Mandell; Jay Hirsh; Jung Soo Suk; Justin Hanes; Richard J Price
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 11.189

6.  Targeted gene transfer to the brain via the delivery of brain-penetrating DNA nanoparticles with focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Brian P Mead; Panagiotis Mastorakos; Jung Soo Suk; Alexander L Klibanov; Justin Hanes; Richard J Price
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  The partitioning of nanoparticles to endothelium or interstitium during ultrasound-microbubble-targeted delivery depends on peak-negative pressure.

Authors:  Y-H Hsiang; J Song; R J Price
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 8.  Drug and gene delivery across the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Kelsie F Timbie; Brian P Mead; Richard J Price
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Synthesis and characterization of transiently stable albumin-coated microbubbles via a flow-focusing microfluidic device.

Authors:  Johnny L Chen; Ali H Dhanaliwala; Adam J Dixon; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Non-invasive delivery of stealth, brain-penetrating nanoparticles across the blood-brain barrier using MRI-guided focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Elizabeth Nance; Kelsie Timbie; G Wilson Miller; Ji Song; Cameron Louttit; Alexander L Klibanov; Ting-Yu Shih; Ganesh Swaminathan; Rafael J Tamargo; Graeme F Woodworth; Justin Hanes; Richard J Price
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.