Literature DB >> 17588350

Lung cancer screening.

Peter J Mazzone1, Tarek Mekhail.   

Abstract

The result of a lung cancer screening program should be fewer lung cancer-specific deaths in the screened population. Studies evaluating chest imaging as a screening tool for lung cancer have not shown a reduction in lung cancer-specific mortality to date. The ability of institutions using chest imaging to meet the criteria for successful screening programs has also been debated. Contentious issues include the presence of an overdiagnosis bias, the ability to find preclinical disease at a curable point in time, the amount of pseudodisease identified, and the cost-effectiveness of screening programs. Current guidelines remain vague as randomized trials are being completed and technologic advances are occurring. The ultimate face of a successful lung cancer screening program is yet to be defined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17588350     DOI: 10.1007/s11912-007-0032-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3790            Impact factor:   5.075


  79 in total

1.  Lung cancer screening using low-dose high-resolution CT scanning in a high-risk workforce: 3500 nuclear fuel workers in three US states.

Authors:  Albert Miller; Steven Markowitz; Amy Manowitz; Jeffrey A Miller
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Early lung cancer action project: initial findings on repeat screenings.

Authors:  C I Henschke; D P Naidich; D F Yankelevitz; G McGuinness; D I McCauley; J P Smith; D Libby; M Pasmantier; M Vazquez; J Koizumi; D Flieder; N Altorki; O S Miettinen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Health screening with CT: prospective assessment of radiation dose and associated detriment.

Authors:  N Buls; J de Mey; P Covens; T Stadnik
Journal:  JBR-BTR       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

4.  The Philadelphia Pulmonary Neoplasm Research Project. Early roentgenographic appearance of bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  W Weiss; K R Boucot
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1974-08

5.  The value of lung cancer detection by six-monthly chest radiographs.

Authors:  G Z Brett
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography.

Authors:  M Kaneko; K Eguchi; H Ohmatsu; R Kakinuma; T Naruke; K Suemasu; N Moriyama
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers.

Authors:  Stefan Diederich; Michael Thomas; Michael Semik; Horst Lenzen; Nikolaus Roos; Anushe Weber; Walter Heindel; Dag Wormanns
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A 10 year follow-up of semi-annual screening for early detection of lung cancer in the Erfurt County, GDR.

Authors:  J Wilde
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  The effect of tumor size on curability of stage I non-small cell lung cancers.

Authors:  Juan P Wisnivesky; David Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  The cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: preliminary results of baseline screening.

Authors:  Juan P Wisnivesky; Alvin I Mushlin; Nachum Sicherman; Claudia Henschke
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer screening: an update, discussion, and look ahead.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  [Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Data analysis: evaluation of nanoscale contrast agent enhanced CT scan to differentiate between benign and malignant lung cancer in mouse model.

Authors:  Robert C Bell; Deevakar Rogith; Craig W Johnson; Cristian T Badea; Khannan K Athreya; Gabriela Espinosa; Darin Clark; A Paiman Ghafoori; Yifan Li; David G Kirsch; Ananth Annapragada; Ketankumar Ghaghada
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

5.  CAXII Is a sero-diagnostic marker for lung cancer.

Authors:  Makoto Kobayashi; Toshihide Matsumoto; Shinichiro Ryuge; Kengo Yanagita; Ryo Nagashio; Yoshitaka Kawakami; Naoki Goshima; Shi-Xu Jiang; Makoto Saegusa; Akira Iyoda; Yukitoshi Satoh; Noriyuki Masuda; Yuichi Sato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Lung cancer screening with computer aided detection chest radiography: design and results of a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael Phillips; Barbara Risius; Bana Bazerbashi; Moulay Meziane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.