Literature DB >> 17624475

Baseline results of the Depiscan study: a French randomized pilot trial of lung cancer screening comparing low dose CT scan (LDCT) and chest X-ray (CXR).

Thierry Blanchon1, Jeanne-Marie Bréchot, Philippe A Grenier, Gilbert R Ferretti, Etienne Lemarié, Bernard Milleron, Dominique Chagué, François Laurent, Yves Martinet, Catherine Beigelman-Aubry, François Blanchon, Marie-Pierre Revel, Sylvie Friard, Martine Rémy-Jardin, Manuela Vasile, Nicola Santelmo, Alain Lecalier, Patricia Lefébure, Denis Moro-Sibilot, Jean-Luc Breton, Marie-France Carette, Christian Brambilla, François Fournel, Alexia Kieffer, Guy Frija, Antoine Flahault.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer has the highest mortality-rate per cancer, with an overall 5-year survival <15%. Several non-randomized studies pointed out the high sensitivity of low dose computed tomography (LDCT) to detect early stage lung cancer. In France, Depiscan, a pilot RCT of LDCT versus chest X-ray (CXR), started on October 2002 to determine the feasibility of enrollment by general practitioners (GPs), investigations and diagnostic procedures by university hospital radiologists and multidisciplinary teams, data management by centralized clinical research assistants, and anticipate the future management of a large national trial.
METHODS: GPs and occupational physicians (OPs) selected and enrolled 1000 subjects in 1 year. Eligible subjects were asymptomatic males or females aged 50-75 years with a current or former cigarette smoking history of >/=15 cigarettes per day for at least 20 years (former smokers having quit <15 years prior to enrollment). Based to randomization, annual LDCT or CXR screenings were planned at baseline and annually for 2 years.
RESULTS: Between October 2002 and December 2004, 765 subjects were enrolled by 89 out of the 232 participating GPs and OPs. Complete clinical and imaging baseline data were available for 621 individuals out of the 765 enrolled, due to 144 noncompliant subjects who withdrew their consent. At least one nodule was detected in 152 out of 336 subjects (45.2%) in the LDCT screening, versus 21 out of 285 subjects (7.4%) in the CXR screening arm. Eight lung cancers were detected in the LDCT arm and one in the CXR arm. DISCUSSION: This pilot trial allows estimating that non-calcified nodules are 10 [6.36-17.07] times more often detected from LDCT than from CXR. However enrollment by GPs was more difficult than expected with 41% active investigators and a high rate (19%) of noncompliant patients. This experience speaks to the need for a high level of GPs formation and a large, coordinated clinical research team in such a trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 02526.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17624475     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  63 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer screening: an update, discussion, and look ahead.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a review of current status.

Authors:  Henry M Marshall; Rayleen V Bowman; Ian A Yang; Kwun M Fong; Christine D Berg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Dose estimation of ultra-low-dose chest CT to different sized adult patients.

Authors:  Tony M Svahn; Tommy Sjöberg; Jennifer C Ast
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  European and North American lung cancer screening experience and implications for pulmonary nodule management.

Authors:  Arjun Nair; David M Hansell
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Adopting helical CT screening for lung cancer: potential health consequences during a 15-year period.

Authors:  Pamela M McMahon; Chung Yin Kong; Milton C Weinstein; Angela C Tramontano; Lauren E Cipriano; Bruce E Johnson; Jane C Weeks; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  U Pastorino
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Unlocking biomarker discovery: large scale application of aptamer proteomic technology for early detection of lung cancer.

Authors:  Rachel M Ostroff; William L Bigbee; Wilbur Franklin; Larry Gold; Mike Mehan; York E Miller; Harvey I Pass; William N Rom; Jill M Siegfried; Alex Stewart; Jeffrey J Walker; Joel L Weissfeld; Stephen Williams; Dom Zichi; Edward N Brody
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; Jonathan D Clapp; Kathy L Clingan; Ilana F Gareen; David A Lynch; Pamela M Marcus; Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The potential for using risk models in future lung cancer screening trials.

Authors:  John K Field; Olaide Y Raji
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-05-24

10.  Gene promoter methylation assayed in exhaled breath, with differences in smokers and lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Weiguo Han; Tao Wang; Andrew A Reilly; Steven M Keller; Simon D Spivack
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2009-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.