Literature DB >> 15249451

Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph: the Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute.

John Gohagan, Pamela Marcus, Richard Fagerstrom, Paul Pinsky, Barnett Kramer, Philip Prorok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-radiation-dose spiral CT (LDCT) scanning is capable of detecting lung neoplasms in asymptomatic individuals. To determine whether such detection can reduce lung cancer mortality, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of LDCT scanning is necessary.
METHODS: The feasibility of conducting an RCT in asymptomatic individuals who are at high risk for lung cancer was explored in the Lung Screening Study (LSS), a 12-month special project of the ongoing Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial. During the fall of 2000, six PLCO screening centers recruited a total of 3,318 heavy or long-term smokers who were not participants in the PLCO trial and randomized them to receive either a screening LDCT scan (1,660 participants) or screening posteroanterior view chest radiograph (CXR) [1,658 participants].
RESULTS: The screens were completed on 96% of subjects in the LDCT scan arm and 93% of subjects in the CXR arm. A total of 20.5% of screened subjects in the LDCT scan arm and 9.8% of those in the CXR arm had findings that were suspicious for lung cancer. Thirty lung cancers in subjects in the LDCT arm and 7 lung cancers in patients in the CXR arm were diagnosed following a positive screening result. Additional data from the LSS indicated that, among persons who were at elevated risk for lung cancer, CT scan use was not pervasive, interest in participating in an RCT of LDCT scanning was strong, and few subjects randomized to CXR either refused their examination or sought a CT scan after their study CXR.
INTERPRETATION: The results of the LSS demonstrated convincingly the feasibility of an RCT of LDCT scanning in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15249451     DOI: 10.1378/chest.126.1.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  62 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer screening: an update, discussion, and look ahead.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Timothy R Church; Richard M Fagerstrom; Barbara Galen; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Jonathan Goldin; John K Gohagan; Bruce Hillman; Carl Jaffe; Barnett S Kramer; David Lynch; Pamela M Marcus; Mitchell Schnall; Daniel C Sullivan; Dorothy Sullivan; Carl J Zylak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Total-body MR-imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Juergen F Schaefer; Heinz-Peter W Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Tarek Mekhail
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Prevalence of non-cancer-related abnormalities on low-dose spiral computer tomography versus chest radiograph in a screening population.

Authors:  Paul Pinsky; Matthew Freedman; Martin Oken; Paul Kvale; Neal Caporaso; John Gohagan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Computed tomography screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Pamela M McMahon; David C Christiani
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-10

Review 7.  Lung cancer screening: promise and pitfalls.

Authors:  Judith J Smith; Christine D Berg
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 8.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a review of current status.

Authors:  Henry M Marshall; Rayleen V Bowman; Ian A Yang; Kwun M Fong; Christine D Berg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Radiographic evaluation of the potential lung volume reduction surgery candidate.

Authors:  George R Washko; Eric Hoffman; John J Reilly
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-05-01

10.  Longitudinal screening algorithm that incorporates change over time in CA125 levels identifies ovarian cancer earlier than a single-threshold rule.

Authors:  Charles W Drescher; Chirag Shah; Jason Thorpe; Kathy O'Briant; Garnet L Anderson; Christine D Berg; Nicole Urban; Martin W McIntosh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.