Literature DB >> 15603850

Final results of the Lung Screening Study, a randomized feasibility study of spiral CT versus chest X-ray screening for lung cancer.

John K Gohagan1, Pamela M Marcus, Richard M Fagerstrom, Paul F Pinsky, Barnett S Kramer, Philip C Prorok, Susan Ascher, William Bailey, Brenda Brewer, Timothy Church, Deborah Engelhard, Melissa Ford, Mona Fouad, Matthew Freedman, Edward Gelmann, David Gierada, William Hocking, Subbarao Inampudi, Brian Irons, Christine Cole Johnson, Arthur Jones, Gena Kucera, Paul Kvale, Karen Lappe, William Manor, Alisha Moore, Hrudaya Nath, Sarah Neff, Martin Oken, Michael Plunkett, Helen Price, Douglas Reding, Thomas Riley, Martin Schwartz, David Spizarny, Roberta Yoffie, Carl Zylak.   

Abstract

The Lung Screening Study (LSS) was a pilot study designed to assess the feasibility of conducting a large scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) of low radiation dose spiral computed tomography (LDCT) versus chest X-ray (CXR) for lung cancer screening. Baseline results of LSS have been previously reported. Here, we report on the findings at the year one screen and on the final results of the LSS study. A total of 1660 subjects were randomized to the LDCT arm and 1658 to the CXR arm. Compliance with screening declined from 96% at baseline to 86% at year one in the LDCT arm and declined from 93% at baseline to 80% at year one in the CXR arm. Positivity rates for the year one screen were 25.8% for LDCT and 8.7% for CXR. Cancer yield was significantly less at year one for LDCT, 0.57%, than at baseline, 1.9%; cancer yield for CXR increased from 0.45% at baseline to 0.68% at year one. Forty lung cancers in the LDCT arm and 20 in the CXR arm were diagnosed over the study period. Stage I cancers comprised 48% of cases in the LDCT arm and 40% in the CXR arm. A total of 16 stage III-IV cancers were observed in the LDCT arm versus nine in the CXR arm. The LSS has established the feasibility of a RCT comparing annual spiral CT to chest X-ray for lung cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15603850     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  64 in total

1.  Development of transcriptomic biomarker signature in human saliva to detect lung cancer.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Hua Xiao; Hui Zhou; Silverio Santiago; Jay M Lee; Edward B Garon; Jieping Yang; Ole Brinkmann; Xinmin Yan; David Akin; David Chia; David Elashoff; No-Hee Park; David T W Wong
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Lung cancer screening: an update, discussion, and look ahead.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Timothy R Church; Richard M Fagerstrom; Barbara Galen; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Jonathan Goldin; John K Gohagan; Bruce Hillman; Carl Jaffe; Barnett S Kramer; David Lynch; Pamela M Marcus; Mitchell Schnall; Daniel C Sullivan; Dorothy Sullivan; Carl J Zylak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Total-body MR-imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Juergen F Schaefer; Heinz-Peter W Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Tarek Mekhail
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Lung cancer screening: promise and pitfalls.

Authors:  Judith J Smith; Christine D Berg
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 7.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a review of current status.

Authors:  Henry M Marshall; Rayleen V Bowman; Ian A Yang; Kwun M Fong; Christine D Berg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Adopting helical CT screening for lung cancer: potential health consequences during a 15-year period.

Authors:  Pamela M McMahon; Chung Yin Kong; Milton C Weinstein; Angela C Tramontano; Lauren E Cipriano; Bruce E Johnson; Jane C Weeks; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Lung cancer screening and its efficacy.

Authors:  Motoyasu Sagawa; Katsuo Usuda; Hirokazu Aikawa; Yuichiro Machida; Makoto Tanaka; Masakatsu Ueno; Tsutomu Sakuma
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-10-16

Review 10.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  U Pastorino
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.