Literature DB >> 20445455

The analysis of simple and complex auditory signals in human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic evidence from M100 modulation.

Julian Jenkins1, William J Idsardi, David Poeppel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ecologically valid signals (e.g., vowels) have multiple components of substantially different frequencies and amplitudes that may not be equally cortically represented. In this study, we investigate a relatively simple signal at an intermediate level of complexity, two-frequency composite tones, a stimulus lying between simple sinusoids and ecologically valid signals such as speech. We aim to characterize the cortical response properties to better understand how complex signals may be represented in auditory cortex.
DESIGN: Using magnetoencephalography, we assessed the sensitivity of the M100/N100m auditory-evoked component to manipulations of the power ratio of the individual frequency components of the two-frequency complexes. Fourteen right-handed subjects with normal hearing were scanned while passively listening to 10 complex and 12 simple signals. The complex signals were composed of one higher frequency and one lower frequency sinusoid; the lower frequency sinusoidal component was at one of the five loudness levels relative to the higher frequency one: -20, -10, 0, +10, +20 dB. The simple signals comprised all the complex signal components presented in isolation.
RESULTS: The data replicate and extend several previous findings: (1) the systematic dependence of the M100 latency on signal intensity and (2) the dependence of the M100 latency on signal frequency, with lower frequency signals ( approximately 100 Hz) exhibiting longer latencies than higher frequency signals ( approximately 1000 Hz) even at matched loudness levels. (3) Importantly, we observe that, relative to simple signals, complex signals show increased response amplitude-as one might predict-but decreased M100 latencies.
CONCLUSION: : The data suggest that by the time the M100 is generated in auditory cortex ( approximately 70 to 80 msecs after stimulus onset), integrative processing across frequency channels has taken place which is observable in the M100 modulation. In light of these data models that attribute more time and processing resources to a complex stimulus merit reevaluation, in that our data show that acoustically more complex signals are associated with robust temporal facilitation, across frequencies and signal amplitude level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20445455      PMCID: PMC4465379          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d99a75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  49 in total

1.  Topographic and temporal indices of vowel spectral envelope extraction in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  E Diesch; T Luce
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry of syllable processing: left-lateralized magnetic N100 varies with syllable categorization in females.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Brigitte Rockstroh; Carsten Eulitz
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Processing asymmetry of transitions between order and disorder in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria Chait; David Poeppel; Alain de Cheveigné; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Latency of evoked neuromagnetic M100 reflects perceptual and acoustic stimulus attributes.

Authors:  T P Roberts; P Ferrari; D Poeppel
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-10-05       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  High-precision neuromagnetic study of the functional organization of the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  B Lütkenhöner; O Steinsträter
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1998 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: pitch versus frequency representation.

Authors:  C Pantev; M Hoke; B Lütkenhöner; K Lehnertz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.

Authors:  Ville Mäkinen; Patrick May; Hannu Tiitinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Frequency-specific modulation of population-level frequency tuning in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Hidehiko Okamoto; Henning Stracke; Pienie Zwitserlood; Larry E Roberts; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Neuromagnetic evidence for early auditory restoration of fundamental pitch.

Authors:  Philip J Monahan; Kevin de Souza; William J Idsardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Auditory Cortical Plasticity Drives Training-Induced Cognitive Changes in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Corby L Dale; Ethan G Brown; Melissa Fisher; Alexander B Herman; Anne F Dowling; Leighton B Hinkley; Karuna Subramaniam; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Sophia Vinogradov
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  The elicitation of audiovisual steady-state responses: multi-sensory signal congruity and phase effects.

Authors:  Julian Jenkins; Ariane E Rhone; William J Idsardi; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Speech compensation responses and sensorimotor adaptation to formant feedback perturbations.

Authors:  Inez Raharjo; Hardik Kothare; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.