Literature DB >> 9575385

High-precision neuromagnetic study of the functional organization of the human auditory cortex.

B Lütkenhöner1, O Steinsträter.   

Abstract

Previous studies have proven that a dipole source analysis of the auditory evoked field is capable of providing evidence of the tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. To explore the nature of the estimated dipoles in greater detail, a single subject was extensively studied, and the estimated sources were registered in a three-dimensional reconstruction of the cortical surface derived from magnetic resonance images. The stimuli were 500-ms tone bursts with frequencies of 250, 500, 1,000, and 2,000 Hz (mean intensity of 60 dB SL). The total number of stimuli presented per condition was about 3,600 (36 independent experiments spread over 4 days). Using special postprocessing techniques, the relative localization accuracy could be enhanced to such an extent that differences in the dipole locations of 1 mm could be clearly distinguished. The results suggest that peak N1m (latency around 100 ms) arises from the planum temporale, whereas peak P2m (latency around 170 ms) appears to correspond to a center of activity in (or close to) Heschl's gyrus. The tonotopic organization found for the generator of N1m was consistent with earlier studies ("the higher the frequency the deeper the source"). However, additional findings (time dependence of the estimated sources; slightly different tonotopy obtained for field change; dependence of the estimated sources on the estimation technique) indicate that multiple areas are involved in the generation of N1m. Evidence of a frequency-dependent source location was found also for P2m.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9575385     DOI: 10.1159/000013790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  69 in total

1.  Modeling extended sources of event-related potentials using anatomical and physiological constraints.

Authors:  W E Kincses; C Braun; S Kaiser; T Elbert
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Subdivisions of auditory cortex and processing streams in primates.

Authors:  J H Kaas; T A Hackett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cortical activation during spoken-word segmentation in nonreading-impaired and dyslexic adults.

Authors:  Päivi Helenius; Riitta Salmelin; Elisabet Service; John F Connolly; Seija Leinonen; Heikki Lyytinen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers.

Authors:  S Nagarajan; H Mahncke; T Salz; P Tallal; T Roberts; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  You had me at "Hello": Rapid extraction of dialect information from spoken words.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Philip J Monahan; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI.

Authors:  Carrie J Scarff; Joseph C Dort; Jos J Eggermont; Bradley G Goodyear
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Discrimination of speech stimuli based on neuronal response phase patterns depends on acoustics but not comprehension.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  "Change deafness" arising from inter-feature masking within a single auditory object.

Authors:  Nicolas Barascud; Timothy D Griffiths; David McAlpine; Maria Chait
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.