Literature DB >> 21380858

The elicitation of audiovisual steady-state responses: multi-sensory signal congruity and phase effects.

Julian Jenkins1, Ariane E Rhone, William J Idsardi, Jonathan Z Simon, David Poeppel.   

Abstract

Most ecologically natural sensory inputs are not limited to a single modality. While it is possible to use real ecological materials as experimental stimuli to investigate the neural basis of multi-sensory experience, parametric control of such tokens is limited. By using artificial bimodal stimuli composed of approximations to ecological signals, we aim to observe the interactions between putatively relevant stimulus attributes. Here we use MEG as an electrophysiological tool and employ as a measure the steady-state response (SSR), an experimental paradigm typically applied to unimodal signals. In this experiment we quantify the responses to a bimodal audio-visual signal with different degrees of temporal (phase) congruity, focusing on stimulus properties critical to audiovisual speech. An amplitude modulated auditory signal ('pseudo-speech') is paired with a radius-modulated ellipse ('pseudo-mouth'), with the envelope of low-frequency modulations occurring in phase or at offset phase values across modalities. We observe (i) that it is possible to elicit an SSR to bimodal signals; (ii) that bimodal signals exhibit greater response power than unimodal signals; and (iii) that the SSR power at specific harmonics and sensors differentially reflects the congruity between signal components. Importantly, we argue that effects found at the modulation frequency and second harmonic reflect differential aspects of neural coding of multisensory signals. The experimental paradigm facilitates a quantitative characterization of properties of multi-sensory speech and other bimodal computations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21380858      PMCID: PMC4125209          DOI: 10.1007/s10548-011-0174-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  54 in total

1.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Bimodal speech: early suppressive visual effects in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Julien Besle; Alexandra Fort; Claude Delpuech; Marie-Hélène Giard
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  The processing of audio-visual speech: empirical and neural bases.

Authors:  Ruth Campbell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Good times for multisensory integration: Effects of the precision of temporal synchrony as revealed by gamma-band oscillations.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Durk Talsma; Maren Grigutsch; Christoph S Herrmann; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Crossmodal attention.

Authors:  J Driver; C Spence
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Detection of audio-visual integration sites in humans by application of electrophysiological criteria to the BOLD effect.

Authors:  G A Calvert; P C Hansen; S D Iversen; M J Brammer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The natural statistics of audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran; Andrea Trubanova; Sébastien Stillittano; Alice Caplier; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Concurrent encoding of frequency and amplitude modulation in human auditory cortex: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Huan Luo; Yadong Wang; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man.

Authors:  H Sohmer; H Pratt; R Kinarti
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Audio-visual synchrony and feature-selective attention co-amplify early visual processing.

Authors:  Christian Keitel; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Physical Feature Encoding and Word Recognition Abilities Are Altered in Children with Intractable Epilepsy: Preliminary Neuromagnetic Evidence.

Authors:  Maria Pardos; Milena Korostenskaja; Jing Xiang; Hisako Fujiwara; Ki H Lee; Paul S Horn; Anna Byars; Jennifer Vannest; Yingying Wang; Nat Hemasilpin; Douglas F Rose
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.342

3.  Seeing the song: left auditory structures may track auditory-visual dynamic alignment.

Authors:  Julia A Mossbridge; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.