RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of a nonlinear microfinite element model on predicting trabecular bone yield and post-yield behavior based on high-resolution in vivo magnetic resonance images via the serial reproducibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nonlinear model captures material nonlinearity by iteratively adjusting tissue-level modulus based on tissue-level effective strain. It enables simulations of trabecular bone yield and post-yield behavior from micro magnetic resonance images at in vivo resolution by solving a series of nonlinear systems via an iterative algorithm on a desktop computer. Measures of mechanical competence (yield strain/strength, ultimate strain/strength, modulus of resilience, and toughness) were estimated at the distal radius of premenopausal and postmenopausal women (N = 20, age range 50-75) in whom osteoporotic fractures typically occur. Each subject underwent three scans (20.2 ± 14.5 days). Serial reproducibility was evaluated via coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Nonlinear simulations were completed in an average of 14 minutes per three-dimensional image data set involving analysis of 61 strain levels. The predicted yield strain/strength, ultimate strain/strength, modulus of resilience, and toughness had a mean value of 0.78%, 3.09 MPa, 1.35%, 3.48 MPa, 14.30 kPa, and 32.66 kPa, respectively, covering a substantial range by a factor of up to 4. Intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.986 to 0.994 (average 0.991); CV ranged from 1.01% to 5.62% (average 3.6%), with yield strain and toughness having the lowest and highest CV values, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the yield and post-yield parameters have adequate reproducibility to evaluate treatment effects in interventional studies within short follow-up periods.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of a nonlinear microfinite element model on predicting trabecular bone yield and post-yield behavior based on high-resolution in vivo magnetic resonance images via the serial reproducibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nonlinear model captures material nonlinearity by iteratively adjusting tissue-level modulus based on tissue-level effective strain. It enables simulations of trabecular bone yield and post-yield behavior from micro magnetic resonance images at in vivo resolution by solving a series of nonlinear systems via an iterative algorithm on a desktop computer. Measures of mechanical competence (yield strain/strength, ultimate strain/strength, modulus of resilience, and toughness) were estimated at the distal radius of premenopausal and postmenopausal women (N = 20, age range 50-75) in whom osteoporotic fractures typically occur. Each subject underwent three scans (20.2 ± 14.5 days). Serial reproducibility was evaluated via coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Nonlinear simulations were completed in an average of 14 minutes per three-dimensional image data set involving analysis of 61 strain levels. The predicted yield strain/strength, ultimate strain/strength, modulus of resilience, and toughness had a mean value of 0.78%, 3.09 MPa, 1.35%, 3.48 MPa, 14.30 kPa, and 32.66 kPa, respectively, covering a substantial range by a factor of up to 4. Intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.986 to 0.994 (average 0.991); CV ranged from 1.01% to 5.62% (average 3.6%), with yield strain and toughness having the lowest and highest CV values, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the yield and post-yield parameters have adequate reproducibility to evaluate treatment effects in interventional studies within short follow-up periods.
Authors: Michael Jeffrey Wald; Jeremy Franklin Magland; Chamith Sudesh Rajapakse; Felix Werner Wehrli Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: X Henry Zhang; X Sherry Liu; Branimir Vasilic; Felix W Wehrli; Maria Benito; Chamith S Rajapakse; Peter J Snyder; X Edward Guo Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Chamith S Rajapakse; Alexander R Farid; Daniel C Kargilis; Brandon C Jones; Jae S Lee; Alyssa J Johncola; Alexandra S Batzdorf; Snehal S Shetye; Michael W Hast; Gregory Chang Journal: Bone Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Gregory Chang; Sean Boone; Dimitri Martel; Chamith S Rajapakse; Robert S Hallyburton; Mitch Valko; Stephen Honig; Ravinder R Regatte Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Salem Alenezi; Amir Masoud Afsahi; Yajun Ma; Jiang Du; Christine B Chung; Eric Y Chang Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Catherine L Omosule; Victoria L Gremminger; Ashley M Aguillard; Youngjae Jeong; Emily N Harrelson; Lawrence Miloscio; Jason Mastaitis; Ashique Rafique; Sandra Kleiner; Ferris M Pfeiffer; Anqing Zhang; Laura C Schulz; Charlotte L Phillips Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 6.741