Literature DB >> 15999292

Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur.

Roland Krug1, S Banerjee, E T Han, D C Newitt, T M Link, S Majumdar.   

Abstract

Previously, high resolution MRI to assess bone structure of deep-seated regions of the skeleton such as the proximal femur was substantially limited by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). With the advent of new optimized pulse sequences in MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T, it may now be possible to depict and quantify the trabecular microarchitecture in the proximal femur. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of assessing trabecular microstructure of the human proximal femur in vivo with MR imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T. MR images of six young, healthy male and female subjects were acquired using standard clinical 1.5-T and high-field 3-T whole-body MR scanners. Using a T2/T1-weighted 3D FIESTA sequence (and a 3D FIESTA-C sequence at 3 T to avoid susceptibility artifacts) a resolution of 0.234 x 0.234 x 1.5 mm(3) was achieved in vivo. Structural parameters analogous to standard bone histomorphometry were determined in femoral head and trochanter regions of interest. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements were also obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the femoral trochanter in the same subjects. The bone structure of the proximal femur is substantially better depicted at 3 T than at 1.5 T. Correlation between the structural parameters obtained at both field strengths was up to R =0.86 for both the femoral head and the trochanteric region. However, the resolution of the images limits the application of 3D structural analysis, making the assessment more akin to 2D textural measures, which may be correlated to histomorphometric but are not identical measures. This feasibility study establishes the potential of MRI as a means of imaging proximal femur structure, and improvements in technique and resolution enhancements are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15999292     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1907-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  24 in total

1.  Three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance microimaging of trabecular bone.

Authors:  H W Chung; F W Wehrli; J L Williams; S L Wehrli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties.

Authors:  S Majumdar; M Kothari; P Augat; D C Newitt; T M Link; J C Lin; T Lang; Y Lu; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Steady-state free precession imaging in the presence of motion: application for improved visualization of the cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  E M Haacke; P A Wielopolski; J A Tkach; M T Modic
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Assessment of trabecular structure using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Majumdar; H K Genant
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1997

Review 5.  Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review.

Authors:  C E Cann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; S F Hodgson; W M O'Fallon; E Y Chao; H W Wahner; J M Muhs; S L Cedel; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-03-22       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Bone mineral density and bone structure parameters as predictors of bone strength: an analysis using computerized microtomography and gastrectomy-induced osteopenia in the rat.

Authors:  M Stenström; B Olander; D Lehto-Axtelius; J E Madsen; L Nordsletten; G A Carlsson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Reproducibility and error sources of micro-MRI-based trabecular bone structural parameters of the distal radius and tibia.

Authors:  B R Gomberg; F W Wehrli; B Vasilić; R H Weening; P K Saha; H K Song; A C Wright
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Correlation of trabecular bone structure with age, bone mineral density, and osteoporotic status: in vivo studies in the distal radius using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Majumdar; H K Genant; S Grampp; D C Newitt; V H Truong; J C Lin; A Mathur
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  60 in total

1.  Evaluation of trabecular microarchitecture in nonosteoporotic postmenopausal women with and without fracture.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Michael Tuite; Diane Kruger; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Michael Kleerekoper; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  In vivo estimation of bone stiffness at the distal femur and proximal tibia using ultra-high-field 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and micro-finite element analysis.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Chamith S Rajapakse; James S Babb; Stephen P Honig; Michael P Recht; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Structural and mechanical parameters of trabecular bone estimated from in vivo high-resolution magnetic resonance images at 3 tesla field strength.

Authors:  Michael Jeffrey Wald; Jeremy Franklin Magland; Chamith Sudesh Rajapakse; Felix Werner Wehrli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Ryan Brown; Cem M Deniz; Kenneth A Egol; James S Babb; Ravinder R Regatte; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Local bone enhancement fuzzy clustering for segmentation of MR trabecular bone images.

Authors:  Jenny Folkesson; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Felix Eckstein; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Femoral neck cortical geometry measured with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with proximal femur strength.

Authors:  S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; P M de Bakker; D Liu; S Kontulainen; P Guy; T R Oxland; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Noninvasive assessment of bone microarchitecture by MRI.

Authors:  Glenn A Ladinsky; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

10.  Using Radon transform of standard radiographs of the hip to differentiate between post-menopausal women with and without fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  H F Boehm; J Lutz; M Körner; W Mutschler; M Reiser; K-J Pfeifer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.