Literature DB >> 20415002

Spatial and temporal properties of gestures in North American English /r/.

Fiona Campbell1, Bryan Gick, Ian Wilson, Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson.   

Abstract

Systematic syllable-based variation has been observed in the relative spatial and temporal properties of supralaryngeal gestures in a number of complex segments. Generally, more anterior gestures tend to appear at syllable peripheries while less anterior gestures occur closer to syllable peaks. Because previous studies compared only two gestures, it is not clear how to characterize the gestures, nor whether timing offsets are categorical or gradient. North American English /r/ is an unusually complex segment, having three supralaryngeal constrictions, but technological limitations have hindered simultaneous study of all three. A novel combination of M-mode ultrasound and optical tracking was used to measure gestural relations in productions of /r/ by nine speakers of Canadian English. Results show a front-to-back timing pattern in syllable-initial position: Lip then tongue blade (TB), then tongue root (TR). In syllable-final position TR and Lip are followed by TB. There was also a reduction in magnitude affecting Lip and TB gestures in syllable-final position and TR in syllable-initial position. These findings are not wholly consistent with any theory advanced thus far to explain syllable-based allophonic variation. It is proposed that the relative magnitude of gestures is a better predictor of timing than relative anteriority or an assigned phonological classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20415002      PMCID: PMC2894326          DOI: 10.1177/0023830909351209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  10 in total

1.  Acoustic modeling of American English /r/.

Authors:  C Y Espy-Wilson; S E Boyce; M Jackson; S Narayanan; A Alwan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production.

Authors:  F H Guenther; C Y Espy-Wilson; S E Boyce; M L Matthies; M Zandipour; J S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Articulatory phonology: an overview.

Authors:  C P Browman; L Goldstein
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  Techniques for field application of lingual ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Bryan Gick; Sonya Bird; Ian Wilson
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2005 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 5.  A guide to analysing tongue motion from ultrasound images.

Authors:  Maureen Stone
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2005 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains.

Authors:  C Fougeron; P A Keating
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part II. The rhotics.

Authors:  A Alwan; S Narayanan; K Haker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production.

Authors:  P F MacNeilage
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.579

9.  A cineradiograhic study of static and dynamic aspects of American English /r/.

Authors:  P A Zawadzki; D P Kuehn
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.759

10.  A three-dimensional model of tongue movement based on ultrasound and x-ray microbeam data.

Authors:  M Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.840

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  Limited acquisition and generalisation of rhotics with ultrasound visual feedback in childhood apraxia.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Edwin Maas; Jessica Whittle; Megan C Leece; Patricia McCabe
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Acquiring rhoticity across languages: An ultrasound study of differentiating tongue movements.

Authors:  Suzanne E Boyce; Sarah M Hamilton; Ahmed Rivera-Campos
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  A gestural account of the velar fricative in Navajo.

Authors:  Khalil Iskarous; Joyce McDonough; D H Whalen
Journal:  Lab Phonol       Date:  2012-05

4.  Variability in individual constriction contributions to third formant values in American English /ɹ/.

Authors:  Sarah Harper; Louis Goldstein; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Tongue shapes for rhotics in school-age children with and without residual speech errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Patricia McCabe; Mark Tiede; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 6.  Tutorial: Motor-Based Treatment Strategies for /r/ Distortions.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Nina R Benway; Megan C Leece; Elaine R Hitchcock; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  EFFECTS OF MOUTHING AND INTERLOCUTOR PRESENCE ON MOVEMENTS OF VISIBLE VS. NON-VISIBLE ARTICULATORS.

Authors:  Katie Bicevskis; Jonathan de Vries; Laurie Green; Johannes Heim; Jurij Božič; Joe D'Aquisto; Michael Fry; Emily Sadlier-Brown; Oksana Tkachman; Noriko Yamane; Bryan Gick
Journal:  Can Acoust       Date:  2016

8.  Perceiving while producing: Modeling the dynamics of phonological planning.

Authors:  Kevin D Roon; Adamantios I Gafos
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Ultrasound visual feedback treatment and practice variability for residual speech sound errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Patricia McCabe; Ahmed Rivera-Campos; Jessica L Whittle; Erik Landry; Edwin Maas
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  The Articulatory Phonetics of /r/ for Residual Speech Errors.

Authors:  Suzanne E Boyce
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 1.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.