Literature DB >> 20407058

Caloric sweetener consumption and dyslipidemia among US adults.

Jean A Welsh1, Andrea Sharma, Jerome L Abramson, Viola Vaccarino, Cathleen Gillespie, Miriam B Vos.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Dietary carbohydrates have been associated with dyslipidemia, a lipid profile known to increase cardiovascular disease risk. Added sugars (caloric sweeteners used as ingredients in processed or prepared foods) are an increasing and potentially modifiable component in the US diet. No known studies have examined the association between the consumption of added sugars and lipid measures.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between consumption of added sugars and blood lipid levels in US adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study among US adults (n = 6113) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2006. Respondents were grouped by intake of added sugars using limits specified in dietary recommendations (< 5% [reference group], 5%-<10%, 10%-<17.5%, 17.5%-<25%, and > or = 25% of total calories). Linear regression was used to estimate adjusted mean lipid levels. Logistic regression was used to determine adjusted odds ratios of dyslipidemia. Interactions between added sugars and sex were evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), geometric mean triglycerides, and mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and adjusted odds ratios of dyslipidemia, including low HDL-C levels (< 40 mg/dL for men; < 50 mg/dL for women), high triglyceride levels (> or = 150 mg/dL), high LDL-C levels (> or = 130 mg/dL), or high ratio of triglycerides to HDL-C (> 3.8). Results were weighted to be representative of the US population.
RESULTS: A mean of 15.8% of consumed calories was from added sugars. Among participants consuming less than 5%, 5% to less than 17.5%, 17.5% to less than 25%, and 25% or greater of total energy as added sugars, adjusted mean HDL-C levels were, respectively, 58.7, 57.5, 53.7, 51.0, and 47.7 mg/dL (P < .001 for linear trend), geometric mean triglyceride levels were 105, 102, 111, 113, and 114 mg/dL (P < .001 for linear trend), and LDL-C levels modified by sex were 116, 115, 118, 121, and 123 mg/dL among women (P = .047 for linear trend). There were no significant trends in LDL-C levels among men. Among higher consumers (> or = 10% added sugars) the odds of low HDL-C levels were 50% to more than 300% greater compared with the reference group (< 5% added sugars).
CONCLUSION: In this study, there was a statistically significant correlation between dietary added sugars and blood lipid levels among US adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20407058      PMCID: PMC3045262          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  23 in total

1.  Low energy reporters vs others: a comparison of reported food intakes.

Authors:  S M Krebs-Smith; B I Graubard; L L Kahle; A F Subar; L E Cleveland; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Choose beverages and foods to moderate your intake of sugars: the 2000 dietary guidelines for Americans--what's all the fuss about?

Authors:  R K Johnson; C Frary
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids.

Authors:  Paula Trumbo; Sandra Schlicker; Allison A Yates; Mary Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-11

5.  The joint WHO/FAO expert consultation on diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: process, product and policy implications.

Authors:  Chizuru Nishida; Ricardo Uauy; Shiriki Kumanyika; Prakash Shetty
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  Rationale of the diet-heart statement of the American Heart Association. Report of Nutrition Committee.

Authors:  S M Grundy; D Bilheimer; H Blackburn; W V Brown; P O Kwiterovich; F Mattson; G Schonfeld; W H Weidman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Effects on blood lipids of a blood pressure-lowering diet: the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Trial.

Authors:  E Obarzanek; F M Sacks; W M Vollmer; G A Bray; E R Miller; P H Lin; N M Karanja; M M Most-Windhauser; T J Moore; J F Swain; C W Bales; M A Proschan
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 8.  Value and limitations of existing scores for the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a review for clinicians.

Authors:  Marie Therese Cooney; Alexandra L Dudina; Ian M Graham
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Accuracy of the triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio for prediction of the low-density lipoprotein phenotype B.

Authors:  Viktor Hanak; Julian Munoz; Joe Teague; Alfred Stanley; Vera Bittner
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Children and adolescents' choices of foods and beverages high in added sugars are associated with intakes of key nutrients and food groups.

Authors:  Carol D Frary; Rachel K Johnson; Min Qi Wang
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.012

View more
  87 in total

1.  Reducing added sugars in the food supply through a cap-and-trade approach.

Authors:  Sanjay Basu; Kristina Lewis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  High-sugar intake does not exacerbate metabolic abnormalities or cardiac dysfunction in genetic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Peter A Hecker; Tatiana F Galvao; Karen M O'Shea; Bethany H Brown; Reney Henderson; Heather Riggle; Sachin A Gupte; William C Stanley
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.008

3.  Added sugar in the packaged foods and beverages available at a major Canadian retailer in 2015: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Rachel B Acton; Lana Vanderlee; Erin P Hobin; David Hammond
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-01-12

4.  Consumption of added sugars is decreasing in the United States.

Authors:  Jean A Welsh; Andrea J Sharma; Lisa Grellinger; Miriam B Vos
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  The bittersweet truth about sugar labeling regulations: they are achievable and overdue.

Authors:  Jennifer L Pomeranz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Candy consumption in childhood is not predictive of weight, adiposity measures or cardiovascular risk factors in young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  C E O'Neil; T A Nicklas; Y Liu; G S Berenson
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.089

7.  Where are kids getting their empty calories? Stores, schools, and fast-food restaurants each played an important role in empty calorie intake among US children during 2009-2010.

Authors:  Jennifer M Poti; Meghan M Slining; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.910

8.  Postprandial lipid responses to standard carbohydrates used to determine glycaemic index values.

Authors:  Sonia Vega-López; Lynne M Ausman; Nirupa R Matthan; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  Does Consuming Sugar and Artificial Sweeteners Change Taste Preferences?

Authors:  Carole Bartolotto
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015

10.  Metabolic responses to prolonged consumption of glucose- and fructose-sweetened beverages are not associated with postprandial or 24-h glucose and insulin excursions.

Authors:  Kimber L Stanhope; Steven C Griffen; Andrew A Bremer; Roel G Vink; Ernst J Schaefer; Katsuyuki Nakajima; Jean-Marc Schwarz; Carine Beysen; Lars Berglund; Nancy L Keim; Peter J Havel
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.