Literature DB >> 1628812

Quantitative genetic variation in body size of mice from new mutations.

P D Keightley1, W G Hill.   

Abstract

To measure the amount of new genetic variation in 6-week weight of mice arising each generation from mutation, selection lines derived from an initially inbred strain were maintained for 25 generations. An analysis using an animal model with restricted maximum likelihood was applied to estimate a mutational genetic component of variance for the infinitesimal model of many genes of small effect. Assuming that the inbred base population was at a mutation-drift equilibrium, it is estimated that the heritability for body size has increased by 1.0% per generation, with lower and upper confidence limits of 0.6% and 1.6%, respectively. A model which includes a mutational genetic component of variance fits the data much better than one involving only base population genetic variance. A model with no genetic component fits the data very poorly. An environmental covariance of body size of mother and offspring was included in the model and accounts for 10% of the variance. By using information only from the observed response to selection, the estimated increase in heritability from mutation is 0.3% per generation. These values are higher than published estimates for the increase in variance from spontaneous mutations in bristle traits of Drosophila, for which there are extensive data, but similar to estimates for various skeletal traits in mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1628812      PMCID: PMC1205040     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  9 in total

1.  Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T F Mackay; R F Lyman; M S Jackson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mixed model analysis of a selection experiment for food intake in mice.

Authors:  K Meyer; W G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Polymorphism of murine endogenous proviruses revealed by using virus class-specific oligonucleotide probes.

Authors:  J P Stoye; J M Coffin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  The rate of polygenic mutation.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Replicated selection for body weight in mice.

Authors:  D S Falconer
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 6.  Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components.

Authors:  T A Mousseau; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  An evaluation of the molecular clock hypothesis using mammalian DNA sequences.

Authors:  W H Li; M Tanimura; P M Sharp
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Nucleotide sequence of the gp70 gene of murine retrovirus MCF 247.

Authors:  C A Holland; J Wozney; N Hopkins
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.103

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Simultaneous Estimation of Additive and Mutational Genetic Variance in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; J David Aguirre; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Within-generation mutation variance for litter size in inbred mice.

Authors:  Joaquim Casellas; Juan F Medrano
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic basis of response to 50 generations of selection on body weight in inbred mice.

Authors:  P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The Impact of Genomic and Traditional Selection on the Contribution of Mutational Variance to Long-Term Selection Response and Genetic Variance.

Authors:  Herman A Mulder; Sang Hong Lee; Sam Clark; Ben J Hayes; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  From Mendel to quantitative genetics in the genome era: the scientific legacy of W. G. Hill.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth; Michael E Goddard; Karin Meyer; Peter M Visscher; Bruce S Weir; Naomi R Wray
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 41.307

6.  Mutational bias for body size in rhabditid nematodes.

Authors:  Dejerianne Ostrow; Naomi Phillips; Arián Avalos; Dustin Blanton; Ashley Boggs; Thomas Keller; Laura Levy; Jeffrey Rosenbloom; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genetic analysis of an F(2) intercross between two chicken lines divergently selected for body-weight.

Authors:  Per Wahlberg; Orjan Carlborg; Mario Foglio; Xavier Tordoir; Ann-Christine Syvänen; Mark Lathrop; Ivo G Gut; Paul B Siegel; Leif Andersson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.