Literature DB >> 12184401

Defining a synthetic pheromone blend attractive to male Heliothis subflexa under wind tunnel conditions.

Neil J Vickers1.   

Abstract

Heliothis subflexa males were flown in a wind tunnel to a variety of combinations of synthetic pheromone components admixed (on a filter paper disk. Blends containing (Z)-l1-hexadecenal (Z11-16:Ald, 1000 ng), (Z)-9-hexadecenal (Z9-16:Ald, 500 ng) and (Z)-11-hexadecenol (Z11-16:OH, 10-500 ng) elicited upwind flight and source contact in 52-69% of males. All these compounds have previously been isolated and identified from female H. subflexa gland extracts and volatile pheromone emissions. Males were not attracted by blends in which Z9-16:Ald was omitted (0% source contact). Similarly, blends lacking Z11-16:OH were unattractive to male H. subflexa (39% or less source contact). Males were extremely sensitive to the presence of Z11-16:OH; ever, responding in high numbers (57-69% source contact) to blends containing a dosage of 1% (10 ng) or greater Z11-16:OH. Males were unresponsive to blends in which Z9-16:Ald was replaced with a variety of dosages of (Z)-9tetradecenal, a secondary component of a closely-related congeneric species, Heliothis virescens. Another compound present in the blend emitted by con-specific females, (Z)-11-hexadecenyl acetate (Z11-16:Ac), did not inhibit H. subflexa males (69% source contact) when added to the three-component mixture (1:0.5:0.1) at a ratio of 0.1 (100 ng) with respect to Z11-16:Ald. These results indicate that Z9-16:Ald and Z11-16:OH are required in addition to Z11-16:Ald to elicit significant levels of upwind flight in H. subflexa males. The effects of Z11-16:Ac are more subtle, but at the dosage tested in these experiments, this compound does not have an antagonistic effect on upwind flight and source location by H. subflexa males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12184401     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016242019571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  11 in total

1.  Effect of release rate and ratio of (Z)-11-hexadecen-1-ol from synthetic pheromone blends on trap capture ofHeliothis subflexa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  R R Heath; E R Mitchell; J Cibrian Tovar
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Behavioral responses of maleHeliothis virescens in a sustained-flight tunnel to combinations of seven compounds identified from female sex pheromone glands.

Authors:  R S Vetter; T C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Identification of a sex pheromone ofHeliothis subflexa (GN.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and field trapping studies using different blends of components.

Authors:  P E Teal; R R Heath; J H Tumlinson; J R McLaughlin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Composition, quantification, and periodicity of sex pheromone gland volatiles from individualHeliothis virescens females.

Authors:  M M Pope; L K Gaston; T C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  A highly conserved nuclear gene for low-level phylogenetics: elongation factor-1 alpha recovers morphology-based tree for heliothine moths.

Authors:  S Cho; A Mitchell; J C Regier; C Mitter; R W Poole; T P Friedlander; S Zhao
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  A new nuclear gene for insect phylogenetics: dopa decarboxylase is informative of relationships within Heliothinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  Q Q Fang; S Cho; J C Regier; C Mitter; M Matthews; R W Poole; T P Friedlander; S Zhao
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Terminal steps in pheromone biosynthesis byHeliothis virescens andH. zea.

Authors:  P E Teal; J H Tumlinson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Chemical and behavioral analyses of volatile sex pheromone components released by callingHeliothis virescens (F.) females (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  P E Teal; J H Tumlinson; R R Heath
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Trace chemicals: the essence of sexual communication systems in heliothis species.

Authors:  J A Klun; J R Plimmer; B A Bierl-Leonhardt; A N Sparks; O L Chapman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Two sex pheromone components of the tobacco budworm moth, Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  W L Roelofs; A S Hill; R T Cardé; T C Baker
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1974-04-16       Impact factor: 5.037

View more
  18 in total

1.  Differential attraction of Heliothis subflexa males to synthetic pheromone lures in Eastern US and Western Mexico.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Richard G Santangelo; Emmarita Ricci; Cavell Brownie; Fred Gould; Coby Schal
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Interspecific pheromone plume interference among sympatric heliothine moths: a wind tunnel test using live, calling females.

Authors:  Jonathan P Lelito; Andrew J Myrick; Thomas C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Hairpencil volatiles influence interspecific courtship and mating between two related moth species.

Authors:  Neil Kirk Hillier; Neil J Vickers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Effect of PBAN on pheromone production by mated Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa females.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Yongliang Fan; Cavell Brownie; Russell A Jurenka; Fred Gould; Coby Schal
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Physiology and glomerular projections of olfactory receptor neurons on the antenna of female Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) responsive to behaviorally relevant odors.

Authors:  N K Hillier; C Kleineidam; N J Vickers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Sexual isolation of male moths explained by a single pheromone response QTL containing four receptor genes.

Authors:  Fred Gould; Marie Estock; N Kirk Hillier; Bekah Powell; Astrid T Groot; Catherine M Ward; Jennifer L Emerson; Coby Schal; Neil J Vickers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Experimental evidence for interspecific directional selection on moth pheromone communication.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Joy L Horovitz; Jennifer Hamilton; Richard G Santangelo; Coby Schal; Fred Gould
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A comparison of responses from olfactory receptor neurons of Heliothis subflexa and Heliothis virescens to components of their sex pheromone.

Authors:  T C Baker; S A Ochieng'; A A Cossé; S G Lee; J L Todd; C Quero; N J Vickers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  A specific male olfactory sensillum detects behaviorally antagonistic hairpencil odorants.

Authors:  N K Hillier; D Kelly; N J Vickers
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.857

10.  Perception of conspecific female pheromone stimulates female calling in an arctiid moth, Utetheisa ornatrix.

Authors:  Hangkyo Lim; Kye Chung Park; Thomas C Baker; Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 2.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.