Literature DB >> 20890796

Age and mating status do not affect transcript levels of odorant receptor genes in male antennae of Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa.

Stephanie Soques1, Gissella M Vásquez, Christina M Grozinger, Fred Gould.   

Abstract

In biological systems, it is expected that gene expression levels generally will correlate with temporally varying physiological and biological needs, and that gene expression levels could regulate biological capabilities. In moth species, male response to female sex pheromones often is affected by moth age and mating status. Odorant receptors (ORs) expressed in neurons within male antennae are critical for detecting the female pheromones. Therefore, we hypothesized that the expression level of these receptor proteins would be affected by age and mating status of male moths. We examined expression levels of two OR genes that are preferentially expressed in the male antennae of Heliothis virescens (HvOR13 and HvOR15) and Heliothis subflexa (HsOR13 and HsOR15). Antennae were dissected from virgin males at 2 h, 1 d, 2 d, 4 d, and 8 d. We also dissected antennae from 4-d-old mated males. We found that age had no effect on expression levels of either OR in either species, except for a small difference in HsOR15 expression between 2 h and 8-d-old virgin males. Furthermore, we found no effect of mating status on expression level of these ORs in either species. We discuss these findings in relationship to studies of age and mating status effects on male electrophysiological and behavioral response to female pheromones, and contrast our results to studies on the effects of age and mating status on gene expression of pheromone receptor proteins and pheromone binding proteins in other moths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20890796     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-010-9863-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  29 in total

1.  An antennal circadian clock and circadian rhythms in peripheral pheromone reception in the moth Spodoptera littoralis.

Authors:  Christine Merlin; Philippe Lucas; Didier Rochat; Marie-Christine François; Martine Maïbèche-Coisne; Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.182

2.  Behavioral responses of maleHeliothis virescens in a sustained-flight tunnel to combinations of seven compounds identified from female sex pheromone glands.

Authors:  R S Vetter; T C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Global signatures of protein and mRNA expression levels.

Authors:  Raquel de Sousa Abreu; Luiz O Penalva; Edward M Marcotte; Christine Vogel
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2009-10-01

4.  Candidate odorant receptors from the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae and evidence of down-regulation in response to blood feeding.

Authors:  A N Fox; R J Pitts; H M Robertson; J R Carlson; L J Zwiebel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sexual isolation of male moths explained by a single pheromone response QTL containing four receptor genes.

Authors:  Fred Gould; Marie Estock; N Kirk Hillier; Bekah Powell; Astrid T Groot; Catherine M Ward; Jennifer L Emerson; Coby Schal; Neil J Vickers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Nearest neural neighbors: moth sex pheromone receptors HR11 and HR13.

Authors:  Thomas C Baker
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Gene expression polymorphism in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  Pawel Michalak; John H Malone; Ivan Timothy Lee; Daiju Hoshino; Daina Ma
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  QTL analysis of sex pheromone blend differences between two closely related moths: Insights into divergence in biosynthetic pathways.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Marie L Estock; Joy L Horovitz; Jennifer Hamilton; Richard G Santangelo; Coby Schal; Fred Gould
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.714

9.  Candidate pheromone receptors provide the basis for the response of distinct antennal neurons to pheromonal compounds.

Authors:  Ewald Grosse-Wilde; Thomas Gohl; Elisabeth Bouché; Heinz Breer; Jürgen Krieger
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Molecular characterization of two pheromone binding proteins and quantitative analysis of their expression in the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua Hübner.

Authors:  Wei-Ming Xiu; Shuang-Lin Dong
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 2.793

View more
  5 in total

1.  Age Influence on Sexual Behavior of the Lesser Cornstalk Borer, Elasmopalpus lignosellus (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).

Authors:  L M S Xavier; D M Magalhães; P A Viana; M C Blassioli-Moraes; M Borges; J A F Barrigossi; E F Vilela; R A Laumann
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 1.434

2.  Construction and analysis of cDNA libraries from the antennae of Batocera horsfieldi and expression pattern of putative odorant binding proteins.

Authors:  Hui Li; Aijun Zhang; Li-Zhen Chen; Guoan Zhang; Man-Qun Wang
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 1.857

Review 3.  Odorant Receptors and Odorant-Binding Proteins as Insect Pest Control Targets: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Herbert Venthur; Jing-Jiang Zhou
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Mosaic Evolution of Molecular Pathways for Sex Pheromone Communication in a Butterfly.

Authors:  Caroline M Nieberding; Patrícia Beldade; Véronique Baumlé; Gilles San Martin; Alok Arun; Georges Lognay; Nicolas Montagné; Lucie Bastin-Héline; Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly; Céline Noirot; Christophe Klopp; Bertanne Visser
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 4.141

5.  Characterization and Levels of Expression of Sensory Neuron Membrane Proteins in the Adult Citrus Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae).

Authors:  Guohui Zhang; Jian Chen; Fulian Wang; Lianyou Gui; Jianming Zhang
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 1.857

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.