Literature DB >> 25252791

Pheromone receptor evolution in the cryptic leafroller species, Ctenopseustis obliquana and C. herana.

Bernd Steinwender1, Amali H Thrimawithana, Ross N Crowhurst, Richard D Newcomb.   

Abstract

How new mate recognition systems evolve when changes are required in both the male and female components remains a conundrum. Here, we investigated the molecular basis of pheromone reception in two species of tortricid (leafroller) moth, Ctenopseustis obliquana and C. herana. Male C. obliquana are attracted to a 90:10 blend of (Z)-8-tetradecenyl acetate (Z8-14:OAc) and (Z)-5-tetradecenyl acetate (Z5-14:OAc), whereas C. herana males are attracted to Z5-14:OAc alone. We used a transcriptome sequencing approach from adult male and female antennae to identify 47 olfactory receptors (ORs) from each species and assessed their expression levels in male and female antennae using RNA-Seq counting and quantitative RT-PCR. Three male-biased and one female-biased OR were identified in C. obliquana by quantitative RT-PCR, and four male-biased and one female-biased receptor in C. herana. The male-biased receptors, CoblOR7, CoblOR30, CherOR7, CherOR30, CherOR1a and CherOR1b were tested for their ability to respond to sex pheromone components in a HEK293 cell calcium assay. CoblOR7 and CherOR7 responded to Z8-14:OAc, however, no receptor for Z5-14:OAc was identified. In addition to Z8-14:OAc, CherOR7 also responded to Z7-14:OAc, indicating that this receptor may be under relaxed constraint. Of the 29 amino acid differences between CoblOR7 and CherOR7, significantly more are located in the third and the sixth transmembrane domain regions. Overall, these findings are consistent with studies revealing the presence of neurons tuned to both Z8-14:OAc and Z5-14:OAc in both species, but that for C. herana males, the ability to detect Z8-14:OAc is currently not required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25252791     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-014-9650-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  73 in total

1.  Simulation study of the reliability and robustness of the statistical methods for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Evolution of the integral membrane desaturase gene family in moths and flies.

Authors:  Douglas C Knipple; Claire-Lise Rosenfield; Rasmus Nielsen; Kyung Man You; Seong Eun Jeong
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A divergent gene family encoding candidate olfactory receptors of the moth Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  Jürgen Krieger; Klaus Raming; Youssef M E Dewer; Stefanie Bette; Sidonie Conzelmann; Heinz Breer
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  De novo assembly and analysis of RNA-seq data.

Authors:  Gordon Robertson; Jacqueline Schein; Readman Chiu; Richard Corbett; Matthew Field; Shaun D Jackman; Karen Mungall; Sam Lee; Hisanaga Mark Okada; Jenny Q Qian; Malachi Griffith; Anthony Raymond; Nina Thiessen; Timothee Cezard; Yaron S Butterfield; Richard Newsome; Simon K Chan; Rong She; Richard Varhol; Baljit Kamoh; Anna-Liisa Prabhu; Angela Tam; YongJun Zhao; Richard A Moore; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra; Steven J M Jones; Pamela A Hoodless; Inanc Birol
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-10-10       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Antennal transcriptome of Manduca sexta.

Authors:  Ewald Grosse-Wilde; Linda S Kuebler; Sascha Bucks; Heiko Vogel; Dieter Wicher; Bill S Hansson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  DNA barcoding of the endemic New Zealand leafroller moth genera, Ctenopseustis and Planotortrix.

Authors:  Pia Langhoff; Astrid Authier; Thomas R Buckley; John S Dugdale; Allen Rodrigo; Richard D Newcomb
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 7.090

7.  Building phylogenetic trees from molecular data with MEGA.

Authors:  Barry G Hall
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Allelic variation in a fatty-acyl reductase gene causes divergence in moth sex pheromones.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Lassance; Astrid T Groot; Marjorie A Liénard; Binu Antony; Christin Borgwardt; Fredrik Andersson; Erik Hedenström; David G Heckel; Christer Löfstedt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Membrane topology of the Drosophila OR83b odorant receptor.

Authors:  Carolina Lundin; Lukas Käll; Scott A Kreher; Katja Kapp; Erik L Sonnhammer; John R Carlson; Gunnar von Heijne; IngMarie Nilsson
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.124

10.  Sex pheromone evolution is associated with differential regulation of the same desaturase gene in two genera of leafroller moths.

Authors:  Jérôme Albre; Marjorie A Liénard; Tamara M Sirey; Silvia Schmidt; Leah K Tooman; Colm Carraher; David R Greenwood; Christer Löfstedt; Richard D Newcomb
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Access to the odor world: olfactory receptors and their role for signal transduction in insects.

Authors:  Joerg Fleischer; Pablo Pregitzer; Heinz Breer; Jürgen Krieger
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Genetic mapping of male pheromone response in the European corn borer identifies candidate genes regulating neurogenesis.

Authors:  Fotini A Koutroumpa; Astrid T Groot; Teun Dekker; David G Heckel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Candidate chemosensory genes identified in Colaphellus bowringi by antennal transcriptome analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Li; Xiu-Yun Zhu; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Yi Wang; Peng He; Geng Chen; Liang Sun; Dao-Gui Deng; Ya-Nan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Candidate pheromone receptors of codling moth Cydia pomonella respond to pheromones and kairomones.

Authors:  Alberto Maria Cattaneo; Francisco Gonzalez; Jonas M Bengtsson; Elizabeth A Corey; Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly; Nicolas Montagné; Umberto Salvagnin; William B Walker; Peter Witzgall; Gianfranco Anfora; Yuriy V Bobkov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Antennal transcriptomes of three tortricid moths reveal putative conserved chemosensory receptors for social and habitat olfactory cues.

Authors:  Francisco Gonzalez; Peter Witzgall; William B Walker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Characterization of Odorant Receptors from a Non-ditrysian Moth, Eriocrania semipurpurella Sheds Light on the Origin of Sex Pheromone Receptors in Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Jothi Kumar Yuvaraj; Jacob A Corcoran; Martin N Andersson; Richard D Newcomb; Olle Anderbrant; Christer Löfstedt
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Odorant Receptors of the New Zealand Endemic Leafroller Moth Species Planotortrix octo and P. excessana.

Authors:  Bernd Steinwender; Amali H Thrimawithana; Ross Crowhurst; Richard D Newcomb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The chemosensory receptors of codling moth Cydia pomonella-expression in larvae and adults.

Authors:  William B Walker; Francisco Gonzalez; Stephen F Garczynski; Peter Witzgall
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Differential gene expression in the evolution of sex pheromone communication in New Zealand's endemic leafroller moths of the genera Ctenopseustis and Planotortrix.

Authors:  Alessandro Grapputo; Amali H Thrimawithana; Bernd Steinwender; Richard D Newcomb
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Endogenous insensitivity to the Orco agonist VUAA1 reveals novel olfactory receptor complex properties in the specialist fly Mayetiola destructor.

Authors:  Jacob A Corcoran; Yonathan Sonntag; Martin N Andersson; Urban Johanson; Christer Löfstedt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.