Literature DB >> 20400882

Refined two-regression model for the ActiGraph accelerometer.

Scott E Crouter1, Erin Kuffel, Jere D Haas, Edward A Frongillo, David R Bassett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to refine the 2006 Crouter two-regression model to eliminate the misclassification of walking or running when starting an activity in the middle of a minute on the ActiGraph clock.
METHODS: Forty-eight participants (mean [SD] age = 35 [11.4] yr) performed 10-min bouts of various activities ranging from sedentary behaviors to vigorous physical activity. Eighteen activities were divided into three routines, and 20 participants performed each routine. Participants wore an ActiGraph accelerometer on the hip, and a portable indirect calorimeter was used to measure energy expenditure. Forty-five routines were used to develop the refined two-regression model, and 15 routines were used to cross validate the model. Coefficient of variation (CV) was used to classify each activity as continuous walking or running (CV < or = 10) or intermittent lifestyle activity (CV > 10).
RESULTS: An exponential regression equation and a cubic equation using the natural log of the 10-s counts were developed to predict METs every 10 s for walking or running and intermittent lifestyle activities, respectively. The refined method examines each 10-s epoch and all combinations of the surrounding five 10-s epochs to find the lowest CV. In the cross-validation group, the refined method was not significantly different from measured METs for any activity (P > 0.05), except cycling (P < 0.05). In addition, the 2006 and the refined two-regression models had similar accuracy and precision for estimating energy expenditure during structured activities.
CONCLUSION: The refined two-regression model should eliminate the misclassification of transitional minutes when changing activities that start and stop in the middle of a minute on the ActiGraph clock, thus improving the estimate of free-living energy expenditure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20400882      PMCID: PMC2891855          DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c37458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  15 in total

1.  Assessment of physical activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., accelerometer: laboratory versus field validation.

Authors:  J F Nichols; C G Morgan; L E Chabot; J F Sallis; K J Calfas
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system.

Authors:  J E McLaughlin; G A King; E T Howley; D R Bassett; B E Ainsworth
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites.

Authors:  A M Swartz; S J Strath; D R Bassett; W L O'Brien; G A King; B E Ainsworth
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running.

Authors:  Søren Brage; Niels Wedderkopp; Paul W Franks; Lars Bo Andersen; Karsten Froberg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity.

Authors:  D R Bassett; B E Ainsworth; A M Swartz; S J Strath; W L O'Brien; G A King
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer.

Authors:  P S Freedson; E Melanson; J Sirard
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Ability of different physical activity monitors to detect movement during treadmill walking.

Authors:  N Y J M Leenders; T E Nelson; W M Sherman
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.118

9.  Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the MTI accelerometer output.

Authors:  Agneta Yngve; Andreas Nilsson; Michael Sjostrom; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Validity of estimating minute-by-minute energy expenditure of continuous walking bouts by accelerometry.

Authors:  Erin E Kuffel; Scott E Crouter; Jere D Haas; Edward A Frongillo; David R Bassett
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  52 in total

1.  Use of a two-regression model for estimating energy expenditure in children.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Magdalene Horton; David R Bassett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Validity of ActiGraph child-specific equations during various physical activities.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Magdalene Horton; David R Bassett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Accelerometer-measured dose-response for physical activity, sedentary time, and mortality in US adults.

Authors:  Charles E Matthews; Sarah Kozey Keadle; Richard P Troiano; Lisa Kahle; Annemarie Koster; Robert Brychta; Dane Van Domelen; Paolo Caserotti; Kong Y Chen; Tamara B Harris; David Berrigan
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  ReadySteady: app for accelerometer-based activity monitoring and wellness-motivation feedback system for older adults.

Authors:  Mithra Vankipuram; Siobhan McMahon; Julie Fleury
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

5.  Using Wearable Activity Type Detection to Improve Physical Activity Energy Expenditure Estimation.

Authors:  Fahd Albinali; Stephen S Intille; William Haskell; Mary Rosenberger
Journal:  Proc ACM Int Conf Ubiquitous Comput       Date:  2010-09

6.  A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.

Authors:  Katherine Ellis; Jacqueline Kerr; Suneeta Godbole; Gert Lanckriet; David Wing; Simon Marshall
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Validity of ActiGraph 2-regression model, Matthews cut-points, and NHANES cut-points for assessing free-living physical activity.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Diane M DellaValle; Jere D Haas; Edward A Frongillo; David R Bassett
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2012-09-11

8.  Estimating activity and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer on the hip or wrist.

Authors:  Mary E Rosenberger; William L Haskell; Fahd Albinali; Selene Mota; Jason Nawyn; Stephen Intille
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Issues in accelerometer methodology: the role of epoch length on estimates of physical activity and relationships with health outcomes in overweight, post-menopausal women.

Authors:  Kelley Pettee Gabriel; James J McClain; Kendra K Schmid; Kristi L Storti; Robin R High; Darcy A Underwood; Lewis H Kuller; Andrea M Kriska
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  A method to estimate free-living active and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer.

Authors:  Kate Lyden; Sarah Kozey Keadle; John Staudenmayer; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.